Suppr超能文献

慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期无创通气时振动筛孔雾化器与喷射雾化器的比较

Comparison of Vibrating Mesh and Jet Nebulizers During Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

作者信息

Avdeev Sergey N, Nuralieva Galia S, Soe Aung Kyaw, Gainitdinova Viliya V, Fink James B

机构信息

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Healthcare Ministry of Russia, Moscow, Russia.

Federal Pulmonology Research Institute, Moscow, Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2021 Dec;34(6):358-365. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2020.1665. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

Abstract

Advances in aerosol technology have improved drug delivery efficiency during noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of aerosol therapy during NIV in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is very limited. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of bronchodilators administered through a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) and jet nebulizer (JN) during NIV in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Prospective randomized cross-over study included 30 patients treated with NIV for acute exacerbation of COPD in an acute care hospital. Patients were consented and enrolled after stabilization of acute exacerbation (3-5 days after admission). Subjects were randomly assigned into two treatment arms receiving salbutamol (2.5 mg): with VMN (Aerogen Solo) and JN (Sidestream) positioned between the leak port and the nonvented oronasal mask during bilevel ventilation with a single-limb circuit. Measurements (clinical data, pulmonary function tests [PFTs], and arterial blood gases) were performed at baseline, 1, and 2 hours after treatment. All measured PFT parameters significantly increased in both groups, but numerically results were better after inhalation with VMN than with JN: for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) (mean increase from baseline to 120 minutes-165 ± 64 mL vs. 116 ± 46 mL,  = 0.001) and for forced vital capacity (FVC) (mean increase-394 ± 154 mL vs. 123 ± 57 mL,  < 0.001). There was also a statistically significant reduction in respiratory rate and in Borg dyspnea score after therapy with VMN in comparison with the conventional JN. In both groups, there were improvements in PaCO, but with VMN these changes were significantly higher. Bronchodilator administration in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD during NIV with VMN resulted in clinically significant improvements in FVC and in Borg dyspnea score. Additional studies required to determine the impact on clinical outcomes.

摘要

雾化技术的进步提高了无创通气(NIV)期间的药物输送效率。关于NIV期间雾化治疗在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期治疗中疗效的临床评估非常有限。我们研究的目的是比较在COPD急性加重期患者的NIV过程中,通过振动网式雾化器(VMN)和喷射雾化器(JN)给药的支气管扩张剂的疗效。前瞻性随机交叉研究纳入了30例在急性护理医院接受NIV治疗COPD急性加重期的患者。患者在急性加重期稳定后(入院后3 - 5天)签署知情同意书并被纳入研究。受试者被随机分为两个治疗组,接受沙丁胺醇(2.5mg)治疗:在使用单回路双水平通气时,VMN(Aerogen Solo)和JN(侧流式)置于泄漏口与无通风口鼻面罩之间。在基线、治疗后1小时和2小时进行测量(临床数据、肺功能测试[PFTs]和动脉血气)。两组中所有测量的PFT参数均显著增加,但数值上VMN吸入后的结果优于JN:第1秒用力呼气量(FEV)(从基线到120分钟的平均增加量 - 165±64mL对116±46mL,P = 0.001)和用力肺活量(FVC)(平均增加量 - 394±154mL对123±57mL,P < 0.001)。与传统的JN相比,VMN治疗后呼吸频率和Borg呼吸困难评分也有统计学意义的降低。两组中PaCO均有改善,但VMN组的这些变化显著更高。在NIV期间,使用VMN对COPD急性加重期患者给予支气管扩张剂可使FVC和Borg呼吸困难评分在临床上有显著改善。需要进一步研究以确定对临床结局的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验