Respiratory Intermediate Care Unit, Hospital General de Agudos Juan A. Fernández, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Dr Research and Development, Science and Emerging Technologies, Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland.
Respir Care. 2023 Jun;68(6):721-726. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10614. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
Bronchodilator delivery via a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has generated interest in recent years. The efficacy of in-line vibrating mesh nebulizers with an HFNC during COPD exacerbation is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical response of subjects with COPD exacerbation who require bronchodilator therapy (anticholinergic and β-agonist) by using a vibrating mesh nebulizer in line with an HFNC.
This was a prospective single-center study performed in a respiratory intermediate care unit that enrolled patients with a diagnosis of COPD exacerbation who required noninvasive ventilation on admission. All the subjects underwent noninvasive ventilation breaks with an HFNC. After clinical stability, pulmonary function tests were performed to assess changes in FEV and clinical parameters before and after bronchodilation by using a vibrating mesh nebulizer in line with an HFNC.
Forty-six patients with COPD exacerbation were admitted. Five patients who did not use noninvasive ventilation and 10 patients who did not receive bronchodilator treatment with a vibrating mesh nebulizer were excluded. Thirty-one were selected, but 1 subject was secondarily excluded due to loss of data. Finally, 30 subjects were included. The primary outcome was spirometric changes in FEV. The mean ± SD FEV before receiving bronchodilator treatment by using a vibrating mesh nebulizer in line with an HFNC was 0.74 ± 0.10 L, and, after receiving treatment, the mean ± SD FEV changed to 0.88 ± 0.12 L ( < .001). Similarly, the mean ± SD FVC increased from 1.75 ± 0.54 L to 2.13 ± 0.63 L ( < .001). Considerable differences were observed in breathing frequency and heart rate after receiving bronchodilator treatment. No relevant changes were observed in the Borg scale or S after treatment. The mean clinical stability recorded was 4 d.
In subjects with COPD exacerbation, bronchodilator treatment by using a vibrating mesh nebulizer in line with an HFNC showed a mild but significant improvement in FEV and FVC. In addition, a decrease in breathing frequency was observed, suggesting a reduction in dynamic hyperinflation.
近年来,高流量鼻导管(HFNC)输送支气管扩张剂引起了人们的兴趣。在 COPD 加重期间,HFNC 与在线振动网式雾化器联合使用时,雾化器的疗效有限。本研究的目的是评估需要支气管扩张剂治疗(抗胆碱能药物和β激动剂)的 COPD 加重患者的临床反应,方法是使用与 HFNC 联合使用的振动网式雾化器。
这是一项在呼吸中级护理病房进行的前瞻性单中心研究,纳入了需要入院时进行无创通气的 COPD 加重诊断患者。所有患者均接受 HFNC 无创通气中断治疗。在临床稳定后,进行肺功能测试,以评估使用与 HFNC 联合使用的振动网式雾化器进行支气管扩张前后 FEV 和临床参数的变化。
共收治 46 例 COPD 加重患者。排除了 5 例未使用无创通气和 10 例未接受振动网式雾化器支气管扩张治疗的患者。选择了 31 例,但由于数据丢失,1 例被二次排除。最终,30 例患者被纳入研究。主要结局是 FEV 的肺功能变化。使用与 HFNC 联合使用的振动网式雾化器进行支气管扩张治疗前的平均±SD FEV 为 0.74±0.10L,治疗后平均±SD FEV 变为 0.88±0.12L(<.001)。同样,平均±SD FVC 从 1.75±0.54L 增加到 2.13±0.63L(<.001)。接受支气管扩张治疗后,呼吸频率和心率均有明显差异。治疗后,Borg 量表或 S 无明显变化。记录的平均临床稳定时间为 4d。
在 COPD 加重患者中,使用与 HFNC 联合使用的振动网式雾化器进行支气管扩张治疗可轻度但显著改善 FEV 和 FVC。此外,观察到呼吸频率降低,表明动态过度充气减少。