• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

足月时再次发生小于胎龄儿的风险取决于之前受影响的分娩数量。

The risk of recurrent small-for-gestational-age infants at term is dependent on the number of previously affected births.

机构信息

Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Mater Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Torus Research, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):415.e1-415.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.219. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.219
PMID:33848539
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Small-for-gestational-age infants are at a substantially increased risk of perinatal complications, but the risk of recurrent small-for-gestational-age is not well known, particularly because there are many demographic and obstetrical factors that interact and modify this risk. We investigated the relationship between previous small-for-gestational-age births and the risk of recurrence at term in a large Australian cohort.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify key demographic and obstetrical variables that influence the risk of recurrence of a small-for-gestational-age infant at term. The primary outcome measure was the odds of recurrence of small-for-gestational-age in subsequent pregnancies up to a maximum of 4 consecutive term births.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective analysis of women who had more than 1 consecutive nonanomalous, singleton, term live births between July 1997 and September 2018 at the Mater Mother's Hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Women with multiple pregnancy, preterm birth, or major congenital malformations were excluded. Small-for-gestational-age was defined as birthweight at the <10th centile. We calculated the odds of recurrence depending on the number of previous small-for-gestational-age infants and if only the preceding infant was small-for-gestational-age. The study population was dichotomized into small-for-gestational-age and non-small-for-gestational-age for each consecutive pregnancy. Univariate analyses compared baseline demographic and obstetrical characteristics followed by logistic regression modeling to determine the odds of recurrence in the second, third, and fourth pregnancies.

RESULTS

The final study comprised 24,819 women. The proportion of women who had a small-for-gestational-age infant in their first pregnancy was 9.4%, whereas the proportion of women who had a small-for-gestational-age infant in their second, third, and fourth pregnancies after the birth of a previous small-for-gestational-age infant were 20.5% (479 of 2338), 24.6% (63 of 256), and 30.4% (14 of 46), respectively. Regardless of parity, the odds of recurrence increased if the preceding infant was small-for-gestational-age. The odds of recurrence increased markedly if there was more than 1 previous small-for-gestational-age infant. In women with 3 previous small-for-gestational-age infants, the adjusted odds of another small-for-gestational-age infant were 66.00 (95% confidence interval, 11.35-383.76). Maternal age, body mass index, ethnicity, and smoking were significant risk factors for recurrent small-for-gestational-age. However, maternal diabetes mellitus or hypertension, either in a previous or current pregnancy, did not influence the risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The risk of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy increased if there was a previous small-for-gestational-age birth. Women with consecutive small-for-gestational-age infants were at the highest risk of recurrence. Our results highlight that women with a previous small-for-gestational-age infant are at a substantial risk of another small infant and need to be counseled and monitored appropriately.

摘要

背景

小于胎龄儿(SGA)的围产期并发症风险显著增加,但 SGA 复发的风险尚不清楚,特别是因为有许多人口统计学和产科因素相互作用并改变了这种风险。我们在一个大型澳大利亚队列中研究了既往 SGA 分娩与足月时 SGA 复发风险之间的关系。

目的

我们旨在确定影响足月时 SGA 复发风险的关键人口统计学和产科变量。主要结局指标是随后妊娠中 SGA 复发的比值比(OR),最多可随访至连续 4 次足月分娩。

研究设计

这是一项对 1997 年 7 月至 2018 年 9 月在澳大利亚布里斯班 Mater Mother's 医院连续有 1 次以上非多胎、单胎、足月活产的女性进行的回顾性分析。排除多胎妊娠、早产或重大先天性畸形的女性。SGA 定义为出生体重位于第 10 百分位数以下。我们根据既往 SGA 婴儿的数量以及仅前一个婴儿是否为 SGA 来计算复发的 OR。对于每个连续妊娠,研究人群均分为 SGA 和非 SGA。单变量分析比较了基线人口统计学和产科特征,然后进行逻辑回归模型分析,以确定第二、第三和第四次妊娠中复发的 OR。

结果

最终研究纳入了 24819 名女性。在第一次妊娠中,SGA 婴儿的比例为 9.4%,而在前一次 SGA 婴儿出生后,第二次、第三次和第四次妊娠中 SGA 婴儿的比例分别为 20.5%(479/2338)、24.6%(63/256)和 30.4%(14/46)。无论产次如何,如果前一个婴儿是 SGA,复发的 OR 都会增加。如果有多个既往 SGA 婴儿,复发的可能性会显著增加。在前 3 次妊娠中均有 SGA 婴儿的女性中,再次发生 SGA 婴儿的调整 OR 为 66.00(95%置信区间,11.35-383.76)。产妇年龄、体重指数、种族和吸烟是 SGA 复发的显著危险因素。然而,既往或当前妊娠中存在糖尿病或高血压均不会影响复发的风险。

结论

如果有既往 SGA 分娩,随后妊娠中复发的风险会增加。连续出现 SGA 婴儿的女性复发风险最高。我们的结果表明,有既往 SGA 婴儿的女性再次出现小婴儿的风险很大,需要进行适当的咨询和监测。

相似文献

1
The risk of recurrent small-for-gestational-age infants at term is dependent on the number of previously affected births.足月时再次发生小于胎龄儿的风险取决于之前受影响的分娩数量。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):415.e1-415.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.219. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.来自低危孕妇的小于胎龄儿有显著更大的不良新生儿结局风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):525.e1-525.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
3
From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts.从人口参考到国家标准:新的和改进的出生体重图表。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):383.e1-383.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.023. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
4
[Risk factors for low birth weight and intrauterine growth retardation in Santiago, Chile].[智利圣地亚哥低出生体重和宫内生长迟缓的风险因素]
Rev Med Chil. 1993 Oct;121(10):1210-9.
5
Low birthweight, preterm births and intrauterine growth retardation in relation to maternal smoking.低出生体重、早产及宫内生长迟缓与母亲吸烟的关系
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1997 Apr;11(2):140-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1997.d01-17.x.
6
Validity of a Delphi consensus definition of growth restriction in the newborn for identifying neonatal morbidity.用于识别新生儿发病率的新生儿生长受限德尔菲共识定义的有效性
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Feb;232(2):224.e1-224.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.033. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
7
Impact of ethnicity on adverse perinatal outcome in women with chronic hypertension: a cohort study.种族对慢性高血压女性不良围产结局的影响:一项队列研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;54(1):72-78. doi: 10.1002/uog.20132.
8
Defining poor growth and stillbirth risk in pregnancy for infants of mothers with overweight and obesity.定义超重和肥胖母亲所生孩子的生长不良和死产风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jul;229(1):59.e1-59.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.322. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
9
Moderate to late preterm intrauterine growth restriction: A restrospective, observational study of the indications for delivery and outcomes in an Australian perinatal centre.中度至晚期早产宫内生长受限:澳大利亚一家围产期中心关于分娩指征及结局的回顾性观察研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Jun;58(3):306-314. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12721. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
10
Diagnosis of fetal growth restriction in a cohort of small-for-gestational-age neonates at term: neonatal and maternal outcomes.足月小于胎龄新生儿队列中胎儿生长受限的诊断:新生儿及母亲结局
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Sep;4(5):100672. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100672. Epub 2022 Jun 3.