Suppr超能文献

生物制剂治疗银屑病的推荐意见:对银屑病临床实践指南的批判性评价。

Biologics recommendations for patients with psoriasis: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for psoriasis.

机构信息

Department of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Department of Standardization of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 Jun;33(4):2038-2050. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1914306. Epub 2022 Feb 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This review article serves to assess the consistency of recommendations from guidelines on biologic agents for psoriasis, based on the quality evaluation of psoriasis Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search to identify CPGs that provide recommendations on diagnosis and treatment for psoriasis. Four reviewers performed a quality assessment of the included CPGs with the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument.

RESULTS

A total of 51 sets of CPGs from 22 medical societies or separate working groups fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The overall quality of the eligible sets of guidelines was moderate to high, with an overall average score of 55%. The highest domain scores were Score and Purpose (70%) and Clarity of Presentation (68%). A total of 95 biologic agent recommendations were extracted from the 18 recommended CPGs. Three biologic agents (Etanercept, Adalimumab, Ustekinumab) were recommended for pediatric patients. Three biologic agents (Adalimumab, Ustekinumab, Secukinumab) were recommended as first-line biologic agents for adults with psoriasis.

CONCLUSION

The overall methodological quality of CPGs for psoriasis is medium to high. More attention should be paid to applicability in guideline development. The recommendations and the basis for them among various sets guidelines were almost consistent.

摘要

目的

本文通过评估银屑病临床实践指南(CPG)的质量,评估生物制剂治疗银屑病的指南推荐的一致性。

方法

我们进行了系统的文献检索,以确定提供银屑病诊断和治疗建议的 CPG。四位审查员使用评估指南研究和评估 II(AGREE II)工具对纳入的 CPG 进行了质量评估。

结果

共有 22 个医学协会或独立工作组的 51 套 CPG 符合纳入标准。合格指南的总体质量为中等到高度,总体平均得分为 55%。得分最高的领域是评分和目的(70%)和表述清晰度(68%)。从 18 个推荐 CPG 中提取了 95 个生物制剂推荐。三种生物制剂(依那西普、阿达木单抗、乌司奴单抗)被推荐用于儿科患者。三种生物制剂(阿达木单抗、乌司奴单抗、司库奇尤单抗)被推荐为成人银屑病的一线生物制剂。

结论

银屑病 CPG 的整体方法学质量为中等到高度。在指南制定过程中,应更加关注适用性。各套指南中的推荐意见及其依据基本一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验