• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同强度模式的神经肌肉电刺激在老年慢性心力衰竭失代偿患者康复中的比较。

Comparison of Different Intensity Modes of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in the Rehabilitation of Elderly Patients with Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure.

机构信息

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow.

出版信息

Kardiologiia. 2021 Mar 30;61(3):23-29. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2021.3.n1457.

DOI:10.18087/cardio.2021.3.n1457
PMID:33849415
Abstract

Aim        To compare effects of neuromuscular electrostimulation (NMES) with various intensity of induced muscle contractions on its tolerance and effect on physical work ability in elderly patients admitted for chronic heart failure (CHF).Material and methods        The study included 22 patients older than 60 years admitted for decompensated CHF. NMES was performed from the 2nd or 3d day of stay in the hospital to the discharge from the hospital. Patients choose the stimulation regimen themselves based on the result of the first session: the high intensity to achieve maximum tolerable muscle contractions (group 1) or the lower intensity to achieve visible/ palpable muscle contractions (group 2). Prior to the onset and after the completion of the training, the 6-min walk test (6MWT) was performed and the general condition of the patient was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS).Results   More patients, mostly women, chose the less intensive NMES (14 vs. 8). The groups did not differ in age, comorbidity, and functional condition. Both groups achieved considerable increases in the 6MWT distance (7.3 [5.6; 176] and 9.8 [7.0; 9.9] %, respectively, p>0.05) and VAS scores without a significant difference between the groups. Among the patients who were compliant with continuing NMES after the discharge from the hospital, 69% were patients of the group of the less intensive stimulation.Conclusion            The less intensive NMES (with achieving visible muscle contractions) was characterized by better tolerance and better compliance in elderly patients with decompensated CHF compared to the more intensive NMES (with achieving maximum contractions), but the less intensive NMES was not inferior to the more intensive NMES in effectiveness.

摘要

目的

比较不同强度的神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)诱导的肌肉收缩对慢性心力衰竭(CHF)老年患者的耐受性和体力活动能力的影响。

材料和方法

这项研究纳入了 22 名年龄在 60 岁以上的因失代偿性 CHF 入院的患者。NMES 从住院的第 2 或第 3 天开始,一直持续到出院。患者根据第一次治疗的结果自行选择刺激方案:高强度以达到最大耐受的肌肉收缩(第 1 组)或低强度以达到可见/可触及的肌肉收缩(第 2 组)。在开始治疗前和治疗结束后,进行 6 分钟步行试验(6MWT),并使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估患者的一般情况。

结果

更多的患者(大多为女性)选择了强度较低的 NMES(14 名 vs. 8 名)。两组在年龄、合并症和功能状况方面没有差异。两组 6MWT 距离均有显著增加(分别为 7.3%[5.6%;176%]和 9.8%[7.0%;9.9%],p>0.05),且两组间 VAS 评分无显著差异。在出院后继续进行 NMES 的患者中,69%为强度较低刺激组的患者。

结论

与高强度 NMES(达到最大收缩)相比,低强度 NMES(达到可见肌肉收缩)在失代偿性 CHF 的老年患者中具有更好的耐受性和更好的依从性,但在疗效方面并不逊于高强度 NMES。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Different Intensity Modes of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in the Rehabilitation of Elderly Patients with Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure.不同强度模式的神经肌肉电刺激在老年慢性心力衰竭失代偿患者康复中的比较。
Kardiologiia. 2021 Mar 30;61(3):23-29. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2021.3.n1457.
2
Feasibility of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in critically ill patients.危重症患者中神经肌肉电刺激的可行性
J Crit Care. 2014 Dec;29(6):1082-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.06.024. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
3
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is feasible in patients with acute heart failure.神经肌肉电刺激在急性心力衰竭患者中是可行的。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Oct;6(5):975-982. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12504. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
4
Acute electromyostimulation decreases muscle sympathetic nerve activity in patients with advanced chronic heart failure (EMSICA Study).急性电肌刺激可降低晚期慢性心力衰竭患者的肌肉交感神经活性(EMSICA 研究)。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e79438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079438. eCollection 2013.
5
Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with heart failure - review.神经肌肉电刺激对心力衰竭患者的影响——综述
J Med Life. 2018 Apr-Jun;11(2):107-118.
6
Wrist Rehabilitation Assisted by an Electromyography-Driven Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Robot After Stroke.中风后由肌电图驱动的神经肌肉电刺激机器人辅助的手腕康复
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Sep;29(8):767-76. doi: 10.1177/1545968314565510. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
7
Effect of neuromuscular stimulation and individualized rehabilitation on muscle strength in Intensive Care Unit survivors: A randomized trial.神经肌肉刺激和个体化康复对重症监护病房幸存者肌肉力量的影响:一项随机试验。
J Crit Care. 2017 Aug;40:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
8
Pain inhibition-the unintended benefit of electrically elicited muscle strengthening contractions.电刺激肌肉强化收缩的意外获益:疼痛抑制。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Feb 18;24(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06243-x.
9
Effects of electromyography-driven robot-aided hand training with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on hand control performance after chronic stroke.肌电图驱动的机器人辅助手部训练结合神经肌肉电刺激对慢性卒中后手控制能力的影响
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015 Mar;10(2):149-59. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.873491. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
10
Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and aerobic exercise training on arterial stiffness and autonomic functions in patients with chronic heart failure.神经肌肉电刺激和有氧运动训练对慢性心力衰竭患者动脉僵硬度和自主功能的影响。
Artif Organs. 2012 Oct;36(10):920-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2012.01474.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Effect of Three Different Surgical Procedures on Ankle Joint Function Rehabilitation of Patients with Hepple V Talus Osteochondral Injury.比较三种不同手术方式对 Hepple V 型距骨骨软骨损伤患者踝关节功能康复的影响。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Oct 10;2022:8110557. doi: 10.1155/2022/8110557. eCollection 2022.
2
Effects of electrode size and placement on comfort and efficiency during low-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps, hamstrings and gluteal muscles.电极大小和放置位置对股四头肌、腘绳肌和臀肌进行低强度神经肌肉电刺激时舒适度和效率的影响。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Jan 16;14(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00403-7.