I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow.
Kardiologiia. 2021 Mar 30;61(3):23-29. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2021.3.n1457.
Aim To compare effects of neuromuscular electrostimulation (NMES) with various intensity of induced muscle contractions on its tolerance and effect on physical work ability in elderly patients admitted for chronic heart failure (CHF).Material and methods The study included 22 patients older than 60 years admitted for decompensated CHF. NMES was performed from the 2nd or 3d day of stay in the hospital to the discharge from the hospital. Patients choose the stimulation regimen themselves based on the result of the first session: the high intensity to achieve maximum tolerable muscle contractions (group 1) or the lower intensity to achieve visible/ palpable muscle contractions (group 2). Prior to the onset and after the completion of the training, the 6-min walk test (6MWT) was performed and the general condition of the patient was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS).Results More patients, mostly women, chose the less intensive NMES (14 vs. 8). The groups did not differ in age, comorbidity, and functional condition. Both groups achieved considerable increases in the 6MWT distance (7.3 [5.6; 176] and 9.8 [7.0; 9.9] %, respectively, p>0.05) and VAS scores without a significant difference between the groups. Among the patients who were compliant with continuing NMES after the discharge from the hospital, 69% were patients of the group of the less intensive stimulation.Conclusion The less intensive NMES (with achieving visible muscle contractions) was characterized by better tolerance and better compliance in elderly patients with decompensated CHF compared to the more intensive NMES (with achieving maximum contractions), but the less intensive NMES was not inferior to the more intensive NMES in effectiveness.
比较不同强度的神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)诱导的肌肉收缩对慢性心力衰竭(CHF)老年患者的耐受性和体力活动能力的影响。
这项研究纳入了 22 名年龄在 60 岁以上的因失代偿性 CHF 入院的患者。NMES 从住院的第 2 或第 3 天开始,一直持续到出院。患者根据第一次治疗的结果自行选择刺激方案:高强度以达到最大耐受的肌肉收缩(第 1 组)或低强度以达到可见/可触及的肌肉收缩(第 2 组)。在开始治疗前和治疗结束后,进行 6 分钟步行试验(6MWT),并使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估患者的一般情况。
更多的患者(大多为女性)选择了强度较低的 NMES(14 名 vs. 8 名)。两组在年龄、合并症和功能状况方面没有差异。两组 6MWT 距离均有显著增加(分别为 7.3%[5.6%;176%]和 9.8%[7.0%;9.9%],p>0.05),且两组间 VAS 评分无显著差异。在出院后继续进行 NMES 的患者中,69%为强度较低刺激组的患者。
与高强度 NMES(达到最大收缩)相比,低强度 NMES(达到可见肌肉收缩)在失代偿性 CHF 的老年患者中具有更好的耐受性和更好的依从性,但在疗效方面并不逊于高强度 NMES。