Suppr超能文献

情侣关系中的巴纳姆效应:亲密程度、参与度和性对接受一般性人格反馈的影响。

The Barnum effect in couples: effects of intimacy, involvement, and sex on acceptance of generalized personality feedback.

作者信息

Handelsman M M, McLain J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Denver 80204.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1988 May;44(3):430-4. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198805)44:3<430::aid-jclp2270440319>3.0.co;2-v.

Abstract

The study assessed the impact of test feedback about one partner on both members of male-female couples. Twenty-four males and 24 females ("participants") took an inkblot test and received a standard personality interpretation-purportedly derived from the test-in the presence of a partner (the "observer"). Half the pairs were strangers; the other half defined themselves as intimate friends. Intimate couples rated the feedback as more accurate, remembered more of the feedback, reported more faith in psychological tests, and rated experimenter skill higher than did strangers. Male participants rated the feedback as more accurate than did male observers. Males may be more receptive of feedback in couples when they themselves have taken the test.

摘要

该研究评估了关于一方伴侣的测试反馈对异性恋情侣双方的影响。24名男性和24名女性(“参与者”)进行了墨迹测试,并在一名伴侣(“观察者”)在场的情况下收到了一份标准的性格解读——据称是从测试中得出的。其中一半的情侣是陌生人;另一半则称他们是亲密的朋友。与陌生人相比,亲密情侣认为反馈更准确,记住的反馈更多,对心理测试的信任度更高,对实验者技能的评价也更高。男性参与者比男性观察者认为反馈更准确。当男性自己接受测试时,他们可能更容易接受情侣关系中的反馈。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验