• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情侣关系中的巴纳姆效应:亲密程度、参与度和性对接受一般性人格反馈的影响。

The Barnum effect in couples: effects of intimacy, involvement, and sex on acceptance of generalized personality feedback.

作者信息

Handelsman M M, McLain J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Denver 80204.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1988 May;44(3):430-4. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198805)44:3<430::aid-jclp2270440319>3.0.co;2-v.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(198805)44:3<430::aid-jclp2270440319>3.0.co;2-v
PMID:3384972
Abstract

The study assessed the impact of test feedback about one partner on both members of male-female couples. Twenty-four males and 24 females ("participants") took an inkblot test and received a standard personality interpretation-purportedly derived from the test-in the presence of a partner (the "observer"). Half the pairs were strangers; the other half defined themselves as intimate friends. Intimate couples rated the feedback as more accurate, remembered more of the feedback, reported more faith in psychological tests, and rated experimenter skill higher than did strangers. Male participants rated the feedback as more accurate than did male observers. Males may be more receptive of feedback in couples when they themselves have taken the test.

摘要

该研究评估了关于一方伴侣的测试反馈对异性恋情侣双方的影响。24名男性和24名女性(“参与者”)进行了墨迹测试,并在一名伴侣(“观察者”)在场的情况下收到了一份标准的性格解读——据称是从测试中得出的。其中一半的情侣是陌生人;另一半则称他们是亲密的朋友。与陌生人相比,亲密情侣认为反馈更准确,记住的反馈更多,对心理测试的信任度更高,对实验者技能的评价也更高。男性参与者比男性观察者认为反馈更准确。当男性自己接受测试时,他们可能更容易接受情侣关系中的反馈。

相似文献

1
The Barnum effect in couples: effects of intimacy, involvement, and sex on acceptance of generalized personality feedback.情侣关系中的巴纳姆效应:亲密程度、参与度和性对接受一般性人格反馈的影响。
J Clin Psychol. 1988 May;44(3):430-4. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198805)44:3<430::aid-jclp2270440319>3.0.co;2-v.
2
Intimacy maturity and its correlates in young married couples.年轻已婚夫妇的亲密关系成熟度及其相关因素。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Jan;50(1):152-62. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.50.1.152.
3
Sex-role attributes, gender, and postpartal perceptions of the marital relationship.性别角色属性、性别与产后对婚姻关系的认知
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1985 Apr;7(3):49-62. doi: 10.1097/00012272-198504000-00006.
4
Effects of perceived sophistication and test validity on acceptance of generalized feedback.感知到的复杂性和测试效度对接受一般性反馈的影响。
J Clin Psychol. 1987 May;43(3):341-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198705)43:3<341::aid-jclp2270430307>3.0.co;2-7.
5
Psychological adjustment, close personal relationships and personality.心理调适、亲密的人际关系与个性
Br J Med Psychol. 1988 Sep;61(3):285-90. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1988.tb02790.x.
6
[Comparative study using the Rorschach test of couples in conflict and the personality structure of their members compared with those in a general psychiatric consultation].
Acta Psychiatr Belg. 1973;73(6):762-84.
7
The role of interpersonal perception in dyadic adjustment.
J Clin Psychol. 1988 May;44(3):424-30. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198805)44:3<424::aid-jclp2270440318>3.0.co;2-n.
8
Problem-solving skills in happy and distressed couples: effects of videotape and verbal feedback.幸福与不幸福夫妻的解决问题技巧:录像带和言语反馈的影响
J Clin Psychol. 1983 May;39(3):340-52. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198305)39:3<340::aid-jclp2270390307>3.0.co;2-h.
9
Intimacy, autonomy and gender: developmental differences and their reflection in adult relationships.亲密关系、自主性与性别:发展差异及其在成人关系中的体现。
J Am Acad Psychoanal. 1984 Oct;12(4):529-44. doi: 10.1521/jaap.1.1984.12.4.529.
10
Gender differences in marital communication patterns.婚姻沟通模式中的性别差异。
Fam Process. 1989 Mar;28(1):89-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1989.00089.x.