Department of Epidemiology and Prevention. IRCCS Neuromed, via dell'Elettronica, Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy.
Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Via Orazio n.2, Napoli, Italy.
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2021 Jun;47(4):372-391. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726034. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis to assess the association of anticoagulants and their dosage with in-hospital all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients. Articles were retrieved until January 8, 2021, by searching in seven electronic databases. The main outcome was all-cause mortality occurred during hospitalization. Data were combined using the general variance-based method on the effect estimate for each study. Separate meta-analyses according to type of COVID-19 patients (hospitalized or intensive care unit [ICU] patients), anticoagulants (mainly heparin), and regimens (therapeutic prophylactic) were conducted. A total of 29 articles were selected, but 23 retrospective studies were eligible for quantitative meta-analyses. No clinical trial was retrieved. The majority of studies were of good quality; however, 34% did not distinguish heparin from other anticoagulants. Meta-analysis on 25,719 hospitalized COVID-19 patients showed that anticoagulant use was associated with 50% reduced in-hospital mortality risk (pooled risk ratio [RR]: 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-0.62; : 87%). Both anticoagulant regimens (therapeutic and prophylactic) reduced in-hospital all-cause mortality, compared with no anticoagulation. Particularly in ICU patients, the anticoagulant therapeutic regimen was associated with a reduced in-hospital mortality risk (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.15-0.60; : 58%) compared with the prophylactic one. However, the former was also associated with a higher risk of bleeding (RR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.60-4.00; : 65%). Anticoagulant use, mainly heparin, reduced all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients during hospitalization. Due to the higher risk of bleeding at therapeutic doses, the use of prophylactic dosages of anticoagulant is probably to be preferred in noncritically ill COVID-19 patients.
我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估抗凝剂及其剂量与 COVID-19 患者住院期间全因死亡率的关系。通过在七个电子数据库中检索,截至 2021 年 1 月 8 日,我们检索到了文章。主要结局是住院期间发生的全因死亡率。使用每个研究的效果估计的通用方差基方法合并数据。根据 COVID-19 患者类型(住院或重症监护病房 [ICU] 患者)、抗凝剂(主要是肝素)和方案(治疗 预防)进行单独的荟萃分析。共选择了 29 篇文章,但只有 23 篇回顾性研究符合定量荟萃分析的条件。没有检索到临床试验。大多数研究质量较高;然而,34%的研究没有将肝素与其他抗凝剂区分开来。对 25719 例住院 COVID-19 患者进行的荟萃分析表明,抗凝剂的使用与住院死亡率降低 50%相关(合并风险比 [RR]:0.50,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.40-0.62; :87%)。与未抗凝治疗相比,抗凝方案(治疗和预防)均降低了住院全因死亡率。特别是在 ICU 患者中,与预防方案相比,抗凝治疗方案与住院死亡率降低相关(RR:0.30,95% CI:0.15-0.60; :58%)。然而,前者也与出血风险增加相关(RR:2.53,95% CI:1.60-4.00; :65%)。抗凝治疗,主要是肝素,降低了 COVID-19 患者住院期间的全因死亡率。由于治疗剂量出血风险较高,非危重症 COVID-19 患者可能更倾向于使用预防剂量的抗凝剂。