Zhou Yanan, Yang Yanping, Wang Ying, Hou Dongni, Song Yuanlin
Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):6391-6405. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-744. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
Blood coagulation dysfunction is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially in severe cases. The evidence for the effects of anticoagulation therapy on prognosis of COVID-19 patients and its risk of causing bleeding events is accumulating. Here we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants in COVID-19 patients of different severity.
We searched PubMed, Embase databases, Cochrane Trials, OVID MEDLINE from December 2019 to April 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving COVID-19 patients over 18 years of age, which explored the effect of anticoagulant and its dose on outcomes including all-cause mortality, bleeding events or thrombotic events. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome. We also performed subgroup analyses to assess the impact of disease severity, using a fixed-effect model to test for heterogeneity. The risk of bias, publication bias, and the quality of evidence were also evaluated.
A total of 20 RCTs were included for final analysis. When compared with standard care, anticoagulation treatment reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.29-0.76) and thrombotic events (RR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.15-0.83) in the whole population with COVID-19 (n=2,365), without increase in bleeding events (total: RR 1.47, 95% CI: 0.54-4.00). Most of the studies only enrolled non-severe patients (n=2,329), while the number of severe patients (n=36) was scarce. In RCTs compared therapeutical and prophylactic doses of anticoagulants, no significant difference in on all-cause mortality was found in the whole population and non-severe and severe subgroups (total: RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.92-1.10; non-severe: RR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.81-1.32; severe: RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.91-1.11). Therapeutical dose reduced risk of thrombotic events (total: RR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.48-0.73; subtotal of non-severe: RR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.84; Subtotal of severe: RR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47-0.78), while risk of bleeding was increased (total: RR 1.98, 95% CI: 1.47-2.66; non-severe: RR 2.38, 95% CI: 1.56-3.62; severe: RR 1.63, 95% CI: 1.07-2.47). Study heterogeneity was found only in the analysis of effects of anticoagulants on risk of thrombotic events.
Anticoagulant therapy reduces all-cause mortality and risk of thrombosis in non-severe COVID-19 patients. Therapeutic dose of anticoagulant therapy can be considered in both non-severe and severe COVID-19 patients to reduce thrombosis, but may be associated with increased bleeding events.
凝血功能障碍是2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者出现不良结局的一个危险因素,尤其是在重症病例中。抗凝治疗对COVID-19患者预后的影响及其导致出血事件的风险的证据正在不断积累。在此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估不同严重程度的COVID-19患者使用抗凝剂的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了2019年12月至2023年4月期间的PubMed、Embase数据库、Cochrane试验、OVID MEDLINE。我们纳入了涉及18岁以上COVID-19患者的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验探讨了抗凝剂及其剂量对包括全因死亡率、出血事件或血栓形成事件等结局的影响。我们计算了每个结局的风险比(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。我们还进行了亚组分析,以评估疾病严重程度的影响,使用固定效应模型检验异质性。还评估了偏倚风险、发表偏倚和证据质量。
共纳入20项RCT进行最终分析。与标准治疗相比,抗凝治疗降低了COVID-19总体人群(n=2365)的全因死亡率(RR 0.47,95%CI:0.29-0.76)和血栓形成事件(RR 0.35,95%CI:0.15-0.83),且未增加出血事件(总计:RR 1.47,95%CI:0.54-4.00)。大多数研究仅纳入了非重症患者(n=2329),而重症患者数量(n=36)较少。在比较抗凝剂治疗剂量和预防剂量的RCT中,总体人群以及非重症和重症亚组的全因死亡率均未发现显著差异(总计:RR 1.01,95%CI:0.92-1.10;非重症:RR 1.03,95%CI:0.81-1.32;重症:RR 1.00,95%CI:0.91-1.11)。治疗剂量降低了血栓形成事件的风险(总计:RR 0.59,95%CI:0.48-0.73;非重症小计:RR 0.57,95%CI:0.39-0.84;重症小计:RR 0.61,95%CI:0.47-0.78),但出血风险增加(总计:RR 1.98,95%CI:1.47-2.66;非重症:RR 2.38,95%CI:1.56-3.62;重症:RR 1.63,95%CI:1.07-2.47)。仅在分析抗凝剂对血栓形成事件风险的影响时发现了研究异质性。
抗凝治疗可降低非重症COVID-19患者的全因死亡率和血栓形成风险。非重症和重症COVID-19患者均可考虑使用治疗剂量的抗凝治疗以降低血栓形成,但可能会增加出血事件。