Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala university, Uppsala, SE-75236, Sweden.
Evolution. 2021 Sep;75(9):2179-2196. doi: 10.1111/evo.14234. Epub 2021 May 3.
A current debate within population genomics surrounds the relevance of patterns of genomic differentiation between closely related species for our understanding of adaptation and speciation. Mounting evidence across many taxa suggests that the same genomic regions repeatedly develop elevated differentiation in independent species pairs. These regions often coincide with high gene density and/or low recombination, leading to the hypothesis that the genomic differentiation landscape mostly reflects a history of background selection, and reveals little about adaptation or speciation. A comparative genomics approach with multiple independent species pairs at a timescale where gene flow and ILS are negligible permits investigating whether different evolutionary processes are responsible for generating lineage-specific versus shared patterns of species differentiation. We use whole-genome resequencing data of 195 individuals from four Ficedula flycatcher species comprising two independent species pairs: collared and pied flycatchers, and red-breasted and taiga flycatchers. We found that both shared and lineage-specific F peaks could partially be explained by selective sweeps, with recurrent selection likely to underlie shared signatures of selection, whereas indirect evidence supports a role of recombination landscape evolution in driving lineage-specific signatures of selection. This work therefore provides evidence for an interplay of positive selection and recombination to genomic landscape evolution.
目前,群体基因组学领域存在一个争议,即密切相关物种之间基因组分化模式对我们理解适应和物种形成的相关性。越来越多的证据表明,在许多分类群中,相同的基因组区域在独立的物种对中反复出现分化增加的现象。这些区域通常与高基因密度和/或低重组率重合,导致了这样一种假说,即基因组分化格局主要反映了背景选择的历史,而对适应或物种形成几乎没有揭示。通过对多个独立的物种对进行比较基因组学研究,在基因流和 ILS 可以忽略不计的时间尺度上,可以研究不同的进化过程是否导致了谱系特异性与共享的物种分化模式的产生。我们使用了来自四个红额金翅雀物种的 195 个个体的全基因组重测序数据,其中包括两个独立的物种对:斑胸草雀和白腰文鸟,以及红胸朱雀和松雀。我们发现,共享和谱系特异性的 F 峰部分可以用选择清扫来解释,而反复选择可能是共享选择信号的基础,而间接证据支持重组景观进化在驱动谱系特异性选择信号中的作用。因此,这项工作为正选择和重组对基因组景观进化的相互作用提供了证据。