Suppr超能文献

有多少医疗保健被浪费了?坦桑尼亚私立营利性和基于信仰的医疗机构中门诊过度供给的横断面研究。

How much healthcare is wasted? A cross-sectional study of outpatient overprovision in private-for-profit and faith-based health facilities in Tanzania.

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.

Health Systems Research Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Plot 463, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, P.O. Box 78 373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2021 Jun 3;36(5):695-706. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab039.

Abstract

Overprovision-healthcare whose harm exceeds its benefit-is of increasing concern in low- and middle-income countries, where the growth of the private-for-profit sector may amplify incentives for providing unnecessary care, and achieving universal health coverage will require efficient resource use. Measurement of overprovision has conceptual and practical challenges. We present a framework to conceptualize and measure overprovision, comparing for-profit and not-for-profit private outpatient facilities across 18 of mainland Tanzania's 22 regions. We developed a novel conceptualization of three harms of overprovision: economic (waste of resources), public health (unnecessary use of antimicrobial agents risking development of resistant organisms) and clinical (high risk of harm to individual patients). Standardized patients (SPs) visited 227 health facilities (99 for-profit and 128 not-for-profit) between May 3 and June 12, 2018, completing 909 visits and presenting 4 cases: asthma, non-malarial febrile illness, tuberculosis and upper respiratory tract infection. Tests and treatments prescribed were categorized as necessary or unnecessary, and unnecessary care was classified by type of harm(s). Fifty-three percent of 1995 drugs prescribed and 43% of 891 tests ordered were unnecessary. At the patient-visit level, 81% of SPs received unnecessary care, 67% received care harmful to public health (prescription of unnecessary antibiotics or antimalarials) and 6% received clinically harmful care. Thirteen percent of SPs were prescribed an antibiotic defined by WHO as 'Watch' (high priority for antimicrobial stewardship). Although overprovision was common in all sectors and geographical regions, clinically harmful care was more likely in for-profit than faith-based facilities and less common in urban than rural areas. Overprovision was widespread in both for-profit and not-for-profit facilities, suggesting considerable waste in the private sector, not solely driven by profit. Unnecessary antibiotic or antimalarial prescriptions are of concern for the development of antimicrobial resistance. Option for policymakers to address overprovision includes the use of strategic purchasing arrangements, provider training and patient education.

摘要

过度供应——其危害超过收益的医疗保健——在中低收入国家越来越受到关注,在这些国家,私营营利部门的增长可能会放大提供不必要医疗服务的激励,而实现全民健康覆盖则需要高效利用资源。过度供应的衡量存在概念和实际挑战。我们提出了一个概念化和衡量过度供应的框架,比较了坦桑尼亚大陆 22 个地区中的 18 个地区的营利性和非营利性私营门诊机构。我们提出了一个过度供应的三种危害的新概念化:经济(资源浪费)、公共卫生(不必要地使用抗菌剂,从而有产生耐药菌的风险)和临床(对个别患者造成高风险的伤害)。标准化患者(SP)于 2018 年 5 月 3 日至 6 月 12 日期间访问了 227 个卫生机构(99 个营利性和 128 个非营利性),完成了 909 次访问并呈现了 4 种病例:哮喘、非疟疾发热性疾病、结核病和上呼吸道感染。规定的测试和治疗被归类为必要或不必要,不必要的护理按危害类型进行分类。所开处方的 1995 种药物中有 53%和所开 891 种检测中有 43%是不必要的。在患者就诊层面,81%的 SP 接受了不必要的护理,67%接受了对公共卫生有害的护理(开了不必要的抗生素或抗疟药),6%接受了临床有害的护理。13%的 SP 被开了一种被世界卫生组织定义为“关注”(抗菌药物管理的高优先级)的抗生素。尽管过度供应在所有部门和地理区域都很常见,但营利性机构比信仰机构更有可能提供临床有害的护理,而农村地区比城市地区更不常见。过度供应在营利性和非营利性机构中都很普遍,这表明私营部门存在相当大的浪费,而不仅仅是由利润驱动的。不必要的抗生素或抗疟药物处方令人担忧,因为这可能会导致抗生素耐药性的产生。决策者可以选择使用战略采购安排、提供者培训和患者教育来解决过度供应的问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验