Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Sep;30(9):1243-1252. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8807. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
Despite screening's effectiveness in reducing cervical cancer incidence and mortality, disparities in cervical cancer screening uptake remain, with lower rates documented among uninsured and low-income individuals. We examined perceived financial barriers to, and the perceived cost burden of, cervical cancer screening. We surveyed 702 low-income, uninsured or publicly insured women ages 25-64 years in North Carolina, U.S., who were not up to date on cervical cancer screening according to national guidelines. Participants were asked about perceived financial barriers to screening and how much they perceived screening would cost. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the sociodemographic predictors of perceived financial barriers. Seventy-two percent of participants perceived financial barriers to screening. Screening appointment costs (71%) and follow-up/future treatment costs (44%) were most commonly reported, followed by lost pay due to time missed from work (6%) and transportation costs (5%). In multivariable analysis, being uninsured (vs. publicly insured), younger (25-34 vs. 50-64 years), White (vs. Black), and not reporting income data were associated with perceiving screening costs and future treatment costs as barriers to screening. Participants reported wide-ranging estimates of the perceived out-of-pocket cost of screening ($0-$1300), with a median expected cost of $245. The majority of our sample of low-income women perceived substantial financial barriers to screening, particularly related to screening appointment costs and potential follow-up/future treatment costs. Providing greater cost transparency and access to financial assistance may reduce perceived financial barriers to screening, potentially increasing screening uptake among this underserved population. Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT02651883.
尽管筛查在降低宫颈癌发病率和死亡率方面具有有效性,但宫颈癌筛查的接受率仍存在差异,未参保和低收入人群的筛查率较低。我们研究了宫颈癌筛查的经济障碍和感知成本负担。我们对美国北卡罗来纳州的 702 名未参保或低保险或公共保险、不符合国家指南规定的宫颈癌筛查要求的 25-64 岁低收入妇女进行了调查。参与者被问及对筛查的经济障碍的看法,以及他们认为筛查的费用是多少。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估社会人口统计学预测因素对感知经济障碍的影响。72%的参与者认为筛查存在经济障碍。筛查预约费用(71%)和随访/未来治疗费用(44%)是最常被报道的,其次是因工作缺勤而导致的工资损失(6%)和交通费用(5%)。在多变量分析中,未参保(而非公共保险)、年龄较小(25-34 岁比 50-64 岁)、白人(而非黑人)和未报告收入数据与认为筛查费用和未来治疗费用是筛查障碍相关。参与者报告了筛查费用的广泛预期自付费用(0-1300 美元),中位数预期费用为 245 美元。我们的低收入妇女样本中,大多数人认为筛查存在重大的经济障碍,特别是与筛查预约费用和潜在的随访/未来治疗费用有关。提供更高的成本透明度和获得经济援助的机会可能会降低对筛查的经济障碍感知,从而有可能增加这一服务不足人群的筛查参与率。Clinicaltrials.gov 注册号:NCT02651883。