D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Hospital Copa Star, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Intensive Care Med. 2021 May;47(5):538-548. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06388-0. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
Clinical characteristics and management of COVID-19 patients have evolved during the pandemic, potentially changing their outcomes. We analyzed the associations of changes in mortality rates with clinical profiles and respiratory support strategies in COVID-19 critically ill patients.
A multicenter cohort of RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted at 126 Brazilian intensive care units between February 27 and October 28, 2020. Assessing temporal changes in deaths, we identified distinct time periods. We evaluated the association of characteristics and respiratory support strategies with 60-day in-hospital mortality using random-effects multivariable Cox regression with inverse probability weighting.
Among the 13,301 confirmed-COVID-19 patients, 60-day in-hospital mortality was 13%. Across four time periods identified, younger patients were progressively more common, non-invasive respiratory support was increasingly used, and the 60-day in-hospital mortality decreased in the last two periods. 4188 patients received advanced respiratory support (non-invasive or invasive), from which 42% underwent only invasive mechanical ventilation, 37% only non-invasive respiratory support and 21% failed non-invasive support and were intubated. After adjusting for organ dysfunction scores and premorbid conditions, we found that younger age, absence of frailty and the use of non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) as first support strategy were independently associated with improved survival (hazard ratio for NIRS first [95% confidence interval], 0.59 [0.54-0.65], p < 0.001).
Age and mortality rates have declined over the first 8 months of the pandemic. The use of NIRS as the first respiratory support measure was associated with survival, but causal inference is limited by the observational nature of our data.
在大流行期间,COVID-19 患者的临床特征和管理方式发生了变化,这可能会改变他们的预后。我们分析了 COVID-19 危重症患者死亡率的变化与临床特征和呼吸支持策略之间的关系。
这是一项多中心队列研究,纳入了 2020 年 2 月 27 日至 10 月 28 日期间在巴西 126 家重症监护病房接受治疗的经 RT-PCR 确诊的 COVID-19 患者。我们通过逆概率加权的随机效应多变量 Cox 回归,评估了死亡率的时间变化与特征和呼吸支持策略之间的关联。
在 13301 例确诊的 COVID-19 患者中,60 天院内死亡率为 13%。在确定的四个时间段中,年轻患者的比例逐渐增加,非侵入性呼吸支持的使用逐渐增加,而在后两个时间段中,60 天院内死亡率下降。4188 例患者接受了高级呼吸支持(非侵入性或侵入性),其中 42%仅接受了侵入性机械通气,37%仅接受了非侵入性呼吸支持,21%的患者非侵入性支持失败并进行了气管插管。调整器官功能障碍评分和合并症后,我们发现年龄较小、无衰弱状态和使用非侵入性呼吸支持(NIRS)作为初始支持策略与生存率提高相关(NIRS 作为初始支持策略的危险比[95%置信区间],0.59 [0.54-0.65],p<0.001)。
在大流行的前 8 个月,年龄和死亡率有所下降。作为初始呼吸支持措施,使用 NIRS 与生存率相关,但由于数据的观察性质,因果关系受到限制。