Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jul;217(1):76-82. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23402. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
The objective of our study was to provide insight on the diagnostic validity of cardiac CTA (CCTA) to identify obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and patients who require urgent intervention, compared with those who require same-admission coronary catheterization (CC), and to help elucidate the necessity of a 24/7 CCTA service. We retrospectively reviewed 658 consecutive CCTA examinations performed of emergency department (ED) patients who presented with acute chest pain from October 1, 2013, to February 28, 2018. Patients were categorized by CAD severity on CCTA. Using same-admission CC as the reference standard, we assessed CCTA's validity to identify obstructive disease using PPV, NPV, sensitivity, and specificity and CCTA's validity to identify patients who require urgent intervention. The added value of the CCTA findings of subendocardial hypoattenuation and wall motion abnormality was evaluated. CCTA examinations were categorized on the basis of the time of day when scanning was performed. The PPV, NPV, and sensitivity of CCTA to diagnose obstructive CAD were 0.87, 0.79, and 0.95, respectively. Nine percent of the scanned patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or were referred for urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The presence of obstructive CAD on CCTA has a PPV of 0.73 to identify patients deemed to be at higher acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk to warrant urgent PCI or CABG. Wall motion abnormality increased the PPV to 1.0; subendocardial attenuation increased the PPV to 0.9. The NPV and sensitivity were 0.89 and 0.97, respectively. Of the CCTA examinations, 54% were performed outside regular working hours. Of the patients who received urgent interventions, 62% underwent CCTA examinations performed outside regular working hours. CCTA provides high correlation with CC, helps identify individuals with high ACS risk, and is further strengthened by functional analysis; 24/7 CCTA service is warranted.
我们的研究目的是提供关于心脏 CT 血管造影(CCTA)诊断阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)和需要紧急介入治疗的患者的有效性的见解,与那些需要同时进行冠状动脉导管插入术(CC)的患者相比,并帮助阐明 24/7 CCTA 服务的必要性。我们回顾性分析了 2013 年 10 月 1 日至 2018 年 2 月 28 日期间因急性胸痛就诊于急诊科的 658 例连续 CCTA 检查患者。根据 CCTA 上 CAD 的严重程度对患者进行分类。以同时进行的 CC 作为参考标准,我们评估了 CCTA 识别阻塞性疾病的准确性,包括阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、敏感性和特异性,以及识别需要紧急干预的患者的准确性。评估了心内膜下低衰减和壁运动异常的 CCTA 发现的附加价值。根据扫描时间将 CCTA 检查分为白天和夜间。CCTA 诊断阻塞性 CAD 的 PPV、NPV 和敏感性分别为 0.87、0.79 和 0.95。9%的扫描患者接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或被转介进行紧急冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。CCTA 上存在阻塞性 CAD 的患者,其 PPV 为 0.73,可识别出被认为处于更高急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)风险的患者,需要紧急 PCI 或 CABG。壁运动异常将 PPV 提高至 1.0;心内膜下衰减将 PPV 提高至 0.9。NPV 和敏感性分别为 0.89 和 0.97。CCTA 检查中,54%在常规工作时间之外进行。接受紧急干预的患者中,62%在常规工作时间之外进行了 CCTA 检查。CCTA 与 CC 具有高度相关性,有助于识别具有高 ACS 风险的个体,并通过功能分析进一步加强;需要提供 24/7 CCTA 服务。