Institut fuer Psychologie, Universitaet Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
J Pers Assess. 2021 Nov-Dec;103(6):740-751. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1905652. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
Previous research has found that traditional assessments of Machiavellianism have insufficient construct coverage and strongly overlap with psychopathy. Tackling these issues, Collison et al. developed the Five Factor Machiavellianism Inventory (FFMI), comprising antagonism, agency, and planfulness. Research by Kückelhaus et al. strongly supports the FFMI's construct validity. However, both of these previous studies share the limitation of common source bias. Therefore, in this study, target participants provided the FFMI self-assessments and coworkers assessed targets in terms of social competency, vocational environments, and occupational success. In a sample of 425 target-coworker dyads, we found that the traditional measures of MACH show a high degree of similarity with psychopathy, while the FFMI is discriminant from psychopathy and shows divergence from traditional measures of MACH with reference to coworker ratings of social competencies, vocational environments, and occupational success. Finally, we explored the interactive relations of the FFMI factors as emergent interpersonal syndromes. The number of significant interactions (18%) clearly exceeded a false positive rate of 5%. Implications and limitations are discussed.
先前的研究发现,传统的马基雅维利主义评估方法在结构涵盖面上存在不足,并且与精神病态有很强的重叠。为了解决这些问题,Collison 等人开发了五因素马基雅维利主义量表(FFMI),包括敌意、能动性和计划性。Kückelhaus 等人的研究强烈支持 FFMI 的结构有效性。然而,这两项先前的研究都存在共同来源偏差的局限性。因此,在这项研究中,目标参与者提供了 FFMI 的自我评估,同事则根据社交能力、职业环境和职业成功对目标进行评估。在一个由 425 个目标-同事对组成的样本中,我们发现传统的 MACH 测量与精神病态有很高的相似性,而 FFMI 与精神病态有区别,并且与同事对社交能力、职业环境和职业成功的评价相比,与传统的 MACH 测量方法有差异。最后,我们探讨了 FFMI 因素作为新兴人际综合征的相互关系。显著相互作用的数量(18%)明显超过了 5%的假阳性率。讨论了其含义和局限性。