Suppr超能文献

直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, the University of Toledo, Toledo, OH; and.

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, the University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.

出版信息

Am J Ther. 2021 Apr 7;28(4):e411-e419. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001351.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) may develop in systolic heart failure or after acute myocardial infarction. The current recommendations support the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the treatment of LVT. Limited data exist regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with LVT. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs for LVT.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through November 2020 for all studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs in patients with LVT. The primary outcomes were LVT resolution, overall thromboembolic events, and thromboembolic stroke. The secondary outcomes were major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained by the Mantel-Haenszel method within a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies including 2153 patients with LVT on anticoagulation (570 on DOACs vs. 1583 on VKAs) were included. LVT resolution was significantly higher in DOACs compared with VKAs [RR: 1.18 (95% CI: 1.04-1.35); P = 0.01, I2 = 25%]. However, no significant difference existed between DOACs and VKAs regarding overall thromboembolic events [RR: 1.10 (95% CI: 0.75-1.62); P = 0.61, I2 = 0%] and thromboembolic stroke [RR: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.39-1.02); P = 0.06, I2 = 0%]. Major bleeding [RR: 1.00 (95% CI: 0.66-1.51); P = 0.99, I2 = 4%] and all-cause mortality [RR: 0.84 (95% CI: 0.50-1.43); P = 0.53, I2 = 0%] were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs seem to be more efficacious in achieving LVT resolution compared with VKAs. However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.

摘要

背景

左心室血栓(LVT)可能在收缩性心力衰竭或急性心肌梗死后发生。目前的建议支持使用维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)治疗 LVT。关于 LVT 患者使用直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的数据有限。这项荟萃分析旨在研究 DOAC 与 VKA 治疗 LVT 的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们通过 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库进行了全面的文献检索,检索时间截至 2020 年 11 月,以评估所有评估 LVT 患者中 DOAC 与 VKA 疗效和安全性的研究。主要结局是 LVT 溶解、总血栓栓塞事件和血栓栓塞性中风。次要结局是大出血和全因死亡率。采用 Mantel-Haenszel 法在随机效应模型中获得合并风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。通过 I2 统计评估异质性。

结果

共纳入 11 项研究,包括 2153 例接受抗凝治疗的 LVT 患者(570 例接受 DOAC 治疗,1583 例接受 VKA 治疗)。DOAC 组 LVT 溶解率明显高于 VKA 组[RR:1.18(95%CI:1.04-1.35);P = 0.01,I2 = 25%]。然而,DOAC 组与 VKA 组在总血栓栓塞事件[RR:1.10(95%CI:0.75-1.62);P = 0.61,I2 = 0%]和血栓栓塞性中风[RR:0.63(95%CI:0.39-1.02);P = 0.06,I2 = 0%]方面无显著差异。大出血[RR:1.00(95%CI:0.66-1.51);P = 0.99,I2 = 4%]和全因死亡率[RR:0.84(95%CI:0.50-1.43);P = 0.53,I2 = 0%]在两组间相似。

结论

DOAC 似乎比 VKA 更能有效地实现 LVT 溶解。然而,两组在血栓栓塞事件、大出血和全因死亡率方面无显著差异。需要随机对照试验来证实我们的发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验