From the PM&R Service, VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas (TMA); Department of PM&R, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (TMA); Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine and Neurology, New York University Langone Health, New York City, New York (J-RR); Association of Academic Physiatrists, Owings Mills, Maryland (AS); VA RR&D Center for Limb Loss and Mobility (CLiMB), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington (DCM); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (DCM, PS); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (JPE); Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria (EI); Departments of Neurology, PM&R, Neuroscience, and Physiology and Cell Biology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (WDA); Department of PM&R, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (MLB, ACB, BED); Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri (CM Cirstea); Division of PM&R, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California (MF); Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (PJ); Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (PR); Department of PM&R, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky (LS); Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center and Division of Rehabilitation Care Services, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington (PS); Clinical Learning, Evidence, and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (PS); Departments of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland (SJS); Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts (QMW, SP); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York (MH); Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska (CM Case); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania (JW); and Healey & AMG Center for ALS and Neurological Clinical Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (SP).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul 1;101(7 Suppl 1):S40-S44. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001752. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
Although the physiatric community increasingly embraces evidence-based medicine (EBM), the current state of EBM training for trainees in physiatry is unclear. The purposes of this article are to report the results of the Association of Academic Physiatrists' surveys of physiatry residency programs in the United States, to discuss the implications of their findings, and to better delineate the "baseline" upon which sound and clear recommendations for systematic EBM training can be made. The two Association of Academic Physiatrists surveys of US physiatry residency programs reveal that most survey respondents report that they include EBM training in their programs that covers the five recommended steps of EBM core competencies. However, although most respondents reported using traditional pedagogic methods of training such as journal club, very few reported that their EBM training used a structured and systematic approach. Future work is needed to support and facilitate physiatry residency programs interested in adopting structured EBM training curricula that include recommended EBM core competencies and the evaluation of their impact.
尽管物理医学与康复医学界越来越接受循证医学(EBM),但目前针对物理医学与康复医学住院医师的 EBM 培训状况尚不清楚。本文旨在报告美国学术物理医学与康复医师协会对物理医学与康复医学住院医师培训项目的调查结果,讨论其发现的意义,并更明确地确定“基线”,以便对系统的循证医学培训提出合理和明确的建议。这两次美国学术物理医学与康复医师协会对物理医学与康复医学住院医师培训项目的调查显示,大多数调查对象报告说,他们在项目中纳入了涵盖 EBM 核心能力五个推荐步骤的 EBM 培训。然而,尽管大多数受访者报告说他们使用了传统的教学方法,如期刊俱乐部来进行培训,但很少有受访者报告说他们的 EBM 培训采用了结构化和系统的方法。未来需要开展工作,为有兴趣采用包括推荐的 EBM 核心能力和评估其影响的结构化 EBM 培训课程的物理医学与康复医学住院医师培训项目提供支持和便利。