Institute of Security and Global Affairs, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0248955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248955. eCollection 2021.
Higher availability of firearms has been connected to higher rates of interpersonal violence in previous studies. Yet, those studies have focused mainly on the United States, or used aggregated international data to study firearm violence. Whether those aggregated findings are applicable to understanding the phenomenon in continental Europe specifically remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to bring together all studies that exclusively use European data.
Nine databases were searched, resulting in more than 1900 individual studies. These studies were assessed on relevance and eligibility for this study, based on their title, abstract and full text. Information on study characteristics, operationalizations of main concepts and study results were extracted from the six eligible studies.
Four studies assessed the impact of firearm restrictive regulations on the rate of firearm homicides. Two other studies correlated rates of firearm availability and -violence. Results vary: some studies show a clear decline once availability of firearms is restricted, while others indicate a limited effect on only a very specific subgroup, such as female victims, or national guards with weapons at home. Moreover, studies used various operationalizations for firearm availability, thereby decreasing the comparability of findings.
Empirical research exclusively using European data is still lacking. To increase comparability of future studies, methodological inconsistencies and regional gaps need to be overcome. Assessing how firearm availability can be measured with reliable and valid proxies across countries will be a crucial first step to improve future research on the link between firearms and firearm violence.
在之前的研究中,枪支的高可得性与人际暴力的高发生率有关。然而,这些研究主要集中在美国,或使用汇总的国际数据来研究枪支暴力。这些汇总的发现是否适用于具体了解欧洲大陆的现象尚不清楚。本系统评价的目的是汇集所有专门使用欧洲数据的研究。
搜索了九个数据库,产生了超过 1900 项单独的研究。根据标题、摘要和全文,评估这些研究与本研究的相关性和适宜性。从六项合格研究中提取了有关研究特征、主要概念的操作化和研究结果的信息。
四项研究评估了枪支限制法规对枪支凶杀率的影响。另外两项研究则将枪支可得性和暴力程度相关联。结果各不相同:一些研究表明,一旦枪支可得性受到限制,就会明显下降,而其他研究则表明,这种限制对非常特定的群体,如女性受害者或家中有武器的国民警卫队,只有有限的影响。此外,研究使用了各种枪支可得性的操作化,从而降低了研究结果的可比性。
专门使用欧洲数据的实证研究仍然缺乏。为了提高未来研究的可比性,需要克服方法上的不一致和地区差距。评估如何在各国之间使用可靠和有效的替代指标来衡量枪支的可得性,将是改善枪支与枪支暴力之间联系的未来研究的关键第一步。