Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 65526Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Acta Radiol. 2022 May;63(5):672-683. doi: 10.1177/02841851211008383. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
The latest International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) guideline recommends low-dose whole-body (WB) computed tomography (CT) as the first-line imaging technique for the initial diagnosis of plasma cell disorders.
To evaluate diagnostic performances of CT and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as the first-line imaging modalities and assess misclassification rates obtained following the guideline.
Two independent radiologists analyzed CT (acquired as PET/CT) and DWI (3-T; b-values = 50 and 900 s/mm) of patients newly diagnosed with plasma cell disorder, categorizing the number of bone lesions. Diagnostic performance of CT and DWI was compared using the McNemar test, and misclassification rates were calculated with a consensus WB-MRI reading as the reference standard. Differences in lesion number categories were assessed using marginal homogeneity and kappa statistics.
Of 56 patients (36 men; mean age = 63.5 years), 39 had myeloma lesions. DWI showed slightly higher sensitivity for detecting myeloma lesions (97.4%) than CT (84.6%-92.3%; > 0.05). CT showed significantly higher specificity (88.2%) than DWI (52.9%-58.8%; <0.05). CT had a higher additional study requirement rate than DWI (7.7%-15.4% vs. 2.6%), but a lower unnecessary treatment rate (11.8% vs. 41.2%-47.1%). Both readers showed significant differences in categorization of the number of lesions on CT compared with the reference standard ( < 0.001), and one reader showed a significant difference on DWI ( = 0.006 and 0.098).
CT interpreted according to the IMWG guideline is a diagnostically effective first-line modality with relatively high sensitivity and specificity. DWI alone may not be an acceptable first-line imaging modality because of low specificity.
最新的国际骨髓瘤工作组(IMWG)指南建议低剂量全身(WB)计算机断层扫描(CT)作为浆细胞疾病初始诊断的一线影像学技术。
评估 CT 和弥散加权成像(DWI)作为一线成像方式的诊断性能,并评估按照指南获得的分类错误率。
两位独立的放射科医生分析了新诊断为浆细胞疾病患者的 CT(作为 PET/CT 采集)和 DWI(3-T;b 值=50 和 900 s/mm),对骨病变数量进行分类。使用 McNemar 检验比较 CT 和 DWI 的诊断性能,并使用共识 WB-MRI 阅读作为参考标准计算分类错误率。使用边缘同质性和 Kappa 统计评估病变数量分类的差异。
在 56 例患者(36 例男性;平均年龄 63.5 岁)中,有 39 例患有骨髓瘤病变。DWI 检测骨髓瘤病变的灵敏度略高于 CT(97.4% vs. 84.6%-92.3%;>0.05)。CT 的特异性明显高于 DWI(88.2% vs. 52.9%-58.8%;<0.05)。CT 的附加研究需求率高于 DWI(7.7%-15.4% vs. 2.6%),但不必要治疗率较低(11.8% vs. 41.2%-47.1%)。两位读者在 CT 上病变数量的分类与参考标准相比均存在显著差异(<0.001),一位读者在 DWI 上存在显著差异(=0.006 和 0.098)。
根据 IMWG 指南解读的 CT 是一种具有较高灵敏度和特异性的诊断有效一线方式。由于特异性较低,单独使用 DWI 可能不是一种可接受的一线成像方式。