Butt Talha, Lehti Leena, Apelqvist Jan, Gottsäter Anders, Acosta Stefan
Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Vascular Center, Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Acta Radiol. 2022 May;63(5):706-713. doi: 10.1177/02841851211006918. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a more extensive distal arterial occlusive disease compared to non-diabetic patients. Diagnostic imaging is a necessity to identify the location and extent of the arterial occlusion in acute limb ischemia (ALI). Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the most commonly used modality and the diagnostic performance with CTA of calf arteries may be questioned.
To evaluate diagnostic performance of CTA of calf arteries in ALI and to compare patients with and without DM.
All thrombolytic treatments performed during 2001-2018 in patients with ALI were included. Initial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and CTA of all patients were classified according to the Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II) below-the-knee arteries and compared to CTA. Two raters assessed the CTA images independently. Inter-rater reliability was expressed as intraclass correlation (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Patients with (n = 23) and without (n = 85) DM had lower ( = 0.006) glomerular filtration rate. ICC between CTA and DSA was 0.33 (95% CI -0.22 to 0.56) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.38-0.68) in patients with and without DM, respectively. Sensitivity with CTA for TASC D lesions in patients with and without DM was 0.14 (95% CI -0.12 to 0.40) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.48-0.80), respectively.
The sensitivity of CTA for assessment of infra-popliteal TASC D lesions in patients with ALI was not acceptable in patients with DM in contrast to those without DM. Another imaging option at present times should be considered for patients with DM.
与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病(DM)患者的远端动脉闭塞性疾病更为广泛。诊断性影像学检查对于确定急性肢体缺血(ALI)时动脉闭塞的位置和范围至关重要。计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)是最常用的检查方式,但其对小腿动脉的诊断性能可能受到质疑。
评估CTA对ALI患者小腿动脉的诊断性能,并比较糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的情况。
纳入2001年至2018年期间对ALI患者进行的所有溶栓治疗病例。所有患者的初始数字减影血管造影(DSA)和CTA均根据外周动脉疾病管理协会间共识(TASC II)对膝下动脉进行分类,并与CTA进行比较。两名评估者独立评估CTA图像。评估者间可靠性以组内相关系数(ICC)及95%置信区间(CI)表示。
糖尿病患者(n = 23)和非糖尿病患者(n = 85)的肾小球滤过率较低(P = 0.006)。CTA与DSA之间的ICC在糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中分别为0.33(95% CI -0.22至0.56)和0.71(95% CI 0.38 - 0.68)。CTA对糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者TASC D病变的敏感性分别为0.14(95% CI -0.12至0.40)和0.64(95% CI 0.48 - 0.80)。
与非糖尿病患者相比,CTA评估ALI患者腘下TASC D病变的敏感性在糖尿病患者中不可接受。目前应为糖尿病患者考虑其他影像学检查选项。