Kim Sung-A, Babazono Akira, Jamal Aziz, Li Yunfei, Liu Ning
Department of Healthcare Administration and Management, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Department of Healthcare Administration and Management, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e041964. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041964.
We compared the care services use and medical institutional deaths among older adults across four home care facility types.
This was a retrospective cohort study.
We used administrative claims data from April 2014 to March 2017.
We included 18 347 residents of Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan, who received home care during the period, and aged ≥75 years with certified care needs of at least level 3. Participants were categorised based on home care facility use (ie, general clinics, Home Care Support Clinics/Hospitals (HCSCs), enhanced HCSCs with beds and enhanced HCSCs without beds).
We used generalised linear models (GLMs) to estimate care utilisation and the incidence of medical institutional death, as well as the potential influence of sex, age, care needs level and Charlson comorbidity index as risk factors.
The results of GLMs showed the inpatient days were 54.3, 69.9, 64.7 and 75.0 for users of enhanced HCSCs with beds, enhanced HCSCs without beds, HCSCs and general clinics, respectively. Correspondingly, the numbers of home care days were 63.8, 51.0, 57.8 and 29.0. Our multivariable logistic regression model estimated medical institutional death rate among participants who died during the study period (n=9919) was 2.32 times higher (p<0.001) for general clinic users than enhanced HCSCs with beds users (relative risks=1.69, p<0.001).
Participants who used enhanced HCSCs with beds had a relatively low inpatient utilisation, medical institutional deaths, and a high utilisation of home care and home-based end-of-life care. Findings suggest enhanced HCSCs with beds could reduce hospitalisation days and medical institutional deaths. Our study warrants further investigations of home care as part of community-based integrated care.
我们比较了四种家庭护理机构类型中老年人的护理服务使用情况和医疗机构死亡情况。
这是一项回顾性队列研究。
我们使用了2014年4月至2017年3月的行政索赔数据。
我们纳入了日本福冈县18347名在此期间接受家庭护理、年龄≥75岁且经认证护理需求至少为3级的居民。参与者根据家庭护理机构的使用情况进行分类(即普通诊所、家庭护理支持诊所/医院(HCSCs)、有床位的强化HCSCs和无床位的强化HCSCs)。
我们使用广义线性模型(GLMs)来估计护理利用率和医疗机构死亡发生率,以及性别、年龄、护理需求水平和Charlson合并症指数作为风险因素的潜在影响。
GLMs结果显示,有床位的强化HCSCs、无床位的强化HCSCs、HCSCs和普通诊所的使用者的住院天数分别为54.3天、69.9天、64.7天和75.0天。相应地,家庭护理天数分别为63.8天、51.0天、57.8天和29.0天。我们的多变量逻辑回归模型估计,在研究期间死亡的参与者(n = 9919)中,普通诊所使用者的医疗机构死亡率比有床位的强化HCSCs使用者高2.32倍(p < 0.001)(相对风险 = 1.69,p < 0.001)。
使用有床位的强化HCSCs的参与者住院利用率相对较低,医疗机构死亡较少,家庭护理和居家临终关怀利用率较高。研究结果表明,有床位的强化HCSCs可以减少住院天数和医疗机构死亡。我们的研究值得进一步调查家庭护理作为社区综合护理一部分的情况。