活性物质亚种菌株PB 54农药风险评估的同行评审。
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance subsp. strain PB 54.
作者信息
Anastassiadou Maria, Arena Maria, Auteri Domenica, Brancato Alba, Bura Laszlo, Carrasco Cabrera Luis, Chaideftou Eugenia, Chiusolo Arianna, Crivellente Federica, De Lentdecker Chloe, Egsmose Mark, Fait Gabriella, Greco Luna, Ippolito Alessio, Istace Frederique, Jarrah Samira, Kardassi Dimitra, Leuschner Renata, Lostia Alfonso, Lythgo Christopher, Magrans Oriol, Mangas Iris, Miron Ileana, Molnar Tunde, Padovani Laura, Parra Morte Juan Manuel, Pedersen Ragnor, Reich Hermine, Santos Miguel, Sharp Rachel, Szentes Csaba, Terron Andrea, Tiramani Manuela, Vagenende Benedicte, Villamar-Bouza Laura
出版信息
EFSA J. 2021 Apr 8;19(4):e06496. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6496. eCollection 2021 Apr.
The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Denmark, and co-rapporteur Member State, the Netherlands, for the pesticide active substance subsp. strain PB 54 and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of subsp. strain PB 54 as an insecticide on stone fruit and ornamentals (field uses) and tomato (field, permanent greenhouse and walk-in tunnel uses). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.
欧洲食品安全局（EFSA）对报告成员国丹麦和联合报告成员国荷兰的主管当局针对农药活性物质亚种菌株PB 54进行的初始风险评估开展同行评审后得出的结论，以及关于将该物质纳入《欧洲共同体理事会第396/2005号条例》附件IV的相关考虑因素均已报告。同行评审的背景是委员会实施条例（欧盟）第844/2012号（经委员会实施条例（欧盟）第2018/1659号修订）所要求的。这些结论是基于对亚种菌株PB 54作为杀虫剂在核果和观赏植物上（田间使用）以及番茄上（田间、永久性温室和步入式隧道使用）的代表性用途的评估得出的。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求的缺失信息。识别出了相关问题。
Zotero 插件