• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与最佳支持治疗相比,低剂量地西他滨可改善低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者的临床反应:一项前瞻性、多中心2期研究。

Lower-dose decitabine improves clinical response compared with best supportive care in lower-risk MDS patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study.

作者信息

Ye Li, Mei Chen, Ren Yanling, Zhou Xinping, Ma Liya, Xu Weilai, Wei Juying, Jiang Huifang, Zhang Liming, Zeng Hui, Tong Hongyan

机构信息

MDS Center, Department of Hematology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China.

Key Laboratory of Hematologic Malignancies of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

J Cancer. 2021 Mar 19;12(10):2975-2981. doi: 10.7150/jca.56207. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.7150/jca.56207
PMID:33854598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8040893/
Abstract

To explore the efficacy and safety of lower-dose decitabine in patients with lower-risk MDS, a prospective multicenter phase II study was conducted to compare decitabine with the best supportive care (BSC). Patients diagnosed with lower-risk MDS from September 2013 to August 2018 were assigned to the decitabine group or the BSC group. Decitabine (12 mg/m/day) was administered over 1 hour/day for 5 consecutive days in a 4-week cycle. BSC, including growth factors, transfusion, thalidomide, lenalidomide, and immunosuppressive agents were given consecutively. The endpoints included the proportion of patients who achieved overall response (OR) in the first 2 or 3 courses, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of recruited 82 patients were analyzed. In the decitabine group, 65.9% (27/41) achieved OR after 2 or 3 cycles of treatment, compared with 22.0% (9/41) in the BSC group (p <0.01). Besides, 44.0% (11/25) in the decitabine group became independent of RBC/Platelets transfusion, compared with 27.8% (5/18) in the BSC group. Patients with gene mutation and treated with decitabine achieved a higher OR rate, compared with those without gene mutation [72.0% (18/25) vs 11.5% (3/26), p <0.01]. There was no significant difference in the median EFS between the decitabine and BSC groups (20.6 vs 14.3 months respectively, p = 0.665). In the decitabine group, the most significant adverse events were infections of any grades or neutropenic fever (46.3%, 19/41) and one patient (4.2%) died of acute cerebral infarction within 6 weeks of treatment. Lower-dose decitabine demonstrated promising clinical response with acceptable toxicity profiles in patients with low- and intermediate 1-risk MDS. A higher response rate to decitabine was observed in patients with mutated genes. Therefore, lower-dose decitabine can be advocated for patients with low-risk MDS and mutated genes.

摘要

为探讨低剂量地西他滨治疗低危骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者的疗效和安全性,开展了一项前瞻性多中心II期研究,比较地西他滨与最佳支持治疗(BSC)。2013年9月至2018年8月诊断为低危MDS的患者被分配至地西他滨组或BSC组。地西他滨(12mg/m²/天)在4周周期内连续5天,每天给药1小时。连续给予BSC,包括生长因子、输血、沙利度胺、来那度胺和免疫抑制剂。终点指标包括在前2或3个疗程中达到总体缓解(OR)的患者比例、无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)。共分析了82例招募患者。地西他滨组中,65.9%(27/41)在2或3个周期治疗后达到OR,而BSC组为22.0%(9/41)(p<0.01)。此外,地西他滨组44.0%(11/25)患者不再依赖红细胞/血小板输血,而BSC组为27.8%(5/18)。与未发生基因突变的患者相比,发生基因突变且接受地西他滨治疗的患者达到更高的OR率[72.0%(18/25)对11.5%(3/26),p<0.01]。地西他滨组和BSC组的中位EFS无显著差异(分别为20.6个月和14.3个月,p=0.665)。地西他滨组中,最显著的不良事件为任何级别的感染或中性粒细胞减少性发热(46.3%,19/41),1例患者(4.2%)在治疗6周内死于急性脑梗死。低剂量地西他滨在低危和中危1 MDS患者中显示出有前景的临床反应及可接受的毒性特征。在发生基因突变的患者中观察到对地西他滨更高的反应率。因此,对于低危MDS和发生基因突变的患者可推荐使用低剂量地西他滨。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/490b/8040893/120dd58ab212/jcav12p2975g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/490b/8040893/bc6805e9f6b8/jcav12p2975g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/490b/8040893/ddc0d4fc54d6/jcav12p2975g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/490b/8040893/120dd58ab212/jcav12p2975g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/490b/8040893/bc6805e9f6b8/jcav12p2975g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/490b/8040893/ddc0d4fc54d6/jcav12p2975g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/490b/8040893/120dd58ab212/jcav12p2975g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Lower-dose decitabine improves clinical response compared with best supportive care in lower-risk MDS patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study.与最佳支持治疗相比,低剂量地西他滨可改善低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者的临床反应:一项前瞻性、多中心2期研究。
J Cancer. 2021 Mar 19;12(10):2975-2981. doi: 10.7150/jca.56207. eCollection 2021.
2
[A preliminary study on the outcome of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome by low-dose decitabine].[低剂量地西他滨治疗低危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效的初步研究]
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 14;38(4):307-312. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.04.009.
3
Low-dose decitabine versus best supportive care in elderly patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: final results of the randomized phase III study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Leukemia Group and the German MDS Study Group.低剂量地西他滨与最佳支持治疗在不适合强化化疗的老年中高危骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者中的比较:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织白血病组和德国 MDS 研究组的随机 III 期研究的最终结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):1987-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.9245. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
4
Randomized phase 2 study of low-dose decitabine vs low-dose azacitidine in lower-risk MDS and MDS/MPN.低剂量地西他滨与低剂量阿扎胞苷治疗低危骨髓增生异常综合征和骨髓增生异常综合征/骨髓增殖性肿瘤的随机2期研究
Blood. 2017 Sep 28;130(13):1514-1522. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-788497. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
5
Economic analysis of decitabine versus best supportive care in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes from a US payer perspective.从美国支付者角度评估地西他滨与最佳支持治疗中高危骨髓增生异常综合征的经济学分析。
Clin Ther. 2010 Dec;32(14):2444-56. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.12.003.
6
[Decitabine treatment in myelodysplastic syndromes--results of a compassionate patient program in Israel].[地西他滨治疗骨髓增生异常综合征——以色列一项患者关爱项目的结果]
Harefuah. 2013 Oct;152(10):591-4, 624.
7
Low-Dose Decitabine versus Low-Dose Azacitidine in Lower-Risk MDS.低剂量地西他滨与低剂量阿扎胞苷治疗低危 MDS。
NEJM Evid. 2022 Oct;1(10):EVIDoa2200034. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2200034. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
8
Response to hypomethylating agents improves long-term outcomes for lower-risk patients with myelodysplastic syndrome in case-matched cohorts.针对低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者,在病例匹配队列中,使用去甲基化药物治疗可改善长期预后。
Ann Hematol. 2018 Dec;97(12):2309-2317. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3458-7. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
9
Decitabine versus best supportive care in older patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEBt) - results of a subgroup analysis of the randomized phase III study 06011 of the EORTC Leukemia Cooperative Group and German MDS Study Group (GMDSSG).地西他滨与最佳支持治疗用于转化型难治性贫血伴原始细胞增多老年患者(RAEBt)——欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织白血病协作组和德国骨髓增生异常综合征研究组(GMDSSG)随机III期研究06011的亚组分析结果
Ann Hematol. 2015 Dec;94(12):2003-13. doi: 10.1007/s00277-015-2489-6. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
10
Epigenetic priming with decitabine followed by low dose idarubicin and cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndromes and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a prospective multicenter single-arm trial.地西他滨诱导的表观遗传学重编程序贯低剂量伊达比星和阿糖胞苷治疗由骨髓增生异常综合征和高危骨髓增生异常综合征进展而来的急性髓系白血病:一项前瞻性多中心单臂试验。
Hematol Oncol. 2020 Oct;38(4):531-540. doi: 10.1002/hon.2755. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The epigenetic revolution in hematology: from benchside breakthroughs to clinical transformations.血液学中的表观遗传学革命:从实验室突破到临床变革。
Clin Exp Med. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):230. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01783-z.
2
Infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.骨髓增生异常综合征患者的感染与抗菌预防
Semin Hematol. 2024 Dec;61(6):348-357. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
3
Long-term hematologic response after azacitidine treatment in a lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patient: A case report.

本文引用的文献

1
Mutation status and burden can improve prognostic prediction of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.基因突变状态和负担可改善低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者的预后预测。
Cancer Sci. 2020 Feb;111(2):580-591. doi: 10.1111/cas.14270. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
2
RBC transfusion independence among lower risk MDS patients receiving hypomethylating agents: a population-level analysis.接受低甲基化药物治疗的低风险骨髓增生异常综合征患者实现红细胞输注独立:一项基于人群水平的分析。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Dec;60(13):3181-3187. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1622700. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
3
Mutations and karyotype predict treatment response in myelodysplastic syndromes.
阿扎胞苷治疗低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者后的长期血液学反应:一例报告
Leuk Res Rep. 2024 Jan 9;21:100412. doi: 10.1016/j.lrr.2024.100412. eCollection 2024.
基因突变和核型可预测骨髓增生异常综合征的治疗反应。
Am J Hematol. 2018 Nov;93(11):1420-1426. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25267. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
4
Isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 mutations correlate with leukemic transformation and are predicted by 2-hydroxyglutarate in myelodysplastic syndromes.异柠檬酸脱氢酶 2 突变与白血病转化相关,并可通过 2-羟戊二酸预测骨髓增生异常综合征中的白血病转化。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun;144(6):1037-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2627-3. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
5
Benefits of hypomethylating therapy in IPSS lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients: A retrospective multicenter case series study.低甲基化治疗对国际预后评分系统(IPSS)低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者的益处:一项回顾性多中心病例系列研究
Leuk Res. 2017 Sep;60:135-144. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
6
Randomized phase 2 study of low-dose decitabine vs low-dose azacitidine in lower-risk MDS and MDS/MPN.低剂量地西他滨与低剂量阿扎胞苷治疗低危骨髓增生异常综合征和骨髓增生异常综合征/骨髓增殖性肿瘤的随机2期研究
Blood. 2017 Sep 28;130(13):1514-1522. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-788497. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
7
Implications of molecular genetic diversity in myelodysplastic syndromes.骨髓增生异常综合征中分子遗传多样性的意义
Curr Opin Hematol. 2017 Mar;24(2):73-78. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000313.
8
Myelodysplastic syndromes: Contemporary review and how we treat.骨髓增生异常综合征:当代综述及治疗方法。
Am J Hematol. 2016 Jan;91(1):76-89. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24253.
9
Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Diagnosis and Treatment.骨髓增生异常综合征:诊断与治疗
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Jul;90(7):969-83. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.04.001.
10
Mutational profiling in patients with MDS: ready for every-day use in the clinic?骨髓增生异常综合征患者的突变谱分析:准备好用于临床日常实践了吗?
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2015 Mar;28(1):32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Nov 12.