Lee Han Hong, Jeong Oh, Seo Ho Seok, Choi Min Gew, Ryu Seong Yeob, Sohn Tae Sung, Bae Jae Moon, Kim Sung, Lee Jun Ho
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul Korea.
Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
J Gastric Cancer. 2021 Mar;21(1):93-102. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e8. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
With advances in surgical techniques, reduced-port laparoscopic surgery is increasingly being performed for the treatment of gastric carcinoma. Many studies have reported satisfactory short-term outcomes after reduced 3-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term oncological outcomes of 3-port LG in patients with gastric carcinoma.
We reviewed the medical records of 1,117 patients who underwent LG for gastric carcinoma in three major institutions between 2012 and 2015. The data showed that 460 patients underwent 3-port LG without assistance, and 657 underwent conventional 5-port LG. We compared the overall and disease-free survival rates between the 2 groups.
There were 642 male and 475 female patients with a mean age of 56.1 years. Among them, 1,028 (92.0%) underwent distal gastrectomy and 89 (8.0%) underwent total gastrectomy. In the final pathologic examination, 1,027 patients (91.9%) were stage I, 73 (6.5%) were stage II, and 17 (1.5%) were stage III, and there were no significant difference in the pathologic stage between groups. The 3- and 5-port LG groups showed no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival (94.3% vs. 96.7%, P=0.138) or disease-free survival (94.3% vs. 95.9%, P=0.231). Stratified analyses according to pT and pN stages also showed no significant differences in overall or disease-free survival between the two groups.
Long-term survival after 3- and 5-port LG was comparable in patients with early-stage gastric carcinoma. The 3-port technique requiring limited surgical assistance may be an appropriate surgical option for this patient population.
随着手术技术的进步,减少切口的腹腔镜手术越来越多地用于治疗胃癌。许多研究报告了三孔腹腔镜胃切除术(LG)术后令人满意的短期疗效。本研究的目的是调查三孔LG治疗胃癌患者的长期肿瘤学结局。
我们回顾了2012年至2015年期间在三家主要机构接受LG治疗胃癌的1117例患者的病历。数据显示,460例患者在无辅助的情况下接受了三孔LG,657例接受了传统的五孔LG。我们比较了两组的总生存率和无病生存率。
共有642例男性和475例女性患者,平均年龄56.1岁。其中,1028例(92.0%)接受了远端胃切除术,89例(8.0%)接受了全胃切除术。在最终病理检查中,1027例患者(91.9%)为I期,73例(6.5%)为II期,17例(1.5%)为III期,两组间病理分期无显著差异。三孔和五孔LG组在5年总生存率(94.3%对96.7%,P=0.138)或无病生存率(94.3%对95.9%,P=0.231)方面无显著差异。根据pT和pN分期进行的分层分析也显示两组在总生存或无病生存方面无显著差异。
早期胃癌患者接受三孔和五孔LG后的长期生存率相当。对于该患者群体,需要有限手术辅助的三孔技术可能是一种合适的手术选择。