Chong Xue Ling, Kumar Aravind, Yang Eugene Wei Ren, Kaliya-Perumal Arun-Kumar, Oh Jacob Yoong-Leong
Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore.
Biomedicine (Taipei). 2020 Jun 5;10(2):30-35. doi: 10.37796/2211-8039.1016. eCollection 2020.
Even though pedicle screw application is a common procedure, and in-spite of spine surgeons being proficient with the technique, mal-positioning of pedicle screws can still occur. We intend to determine by postoperative CT analysis, the incidence of pedicle screw breach in the thoracolumbar spine despite satisfactory intraoperative placement confirmed by fluoroscopy.
Consecutive patients diagnosed with thoracolumbar fractures who underwent open or minimally invasive posterior stabilization under fluoroscopic guidance were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative CT scans of patients were analysed to determine the incidence of pedicle breach despite satisfactory intraoperative placement, and also to determine the factors that can predict a breach during intraoperative assessment.
A total of 61 patients with 513 thoracolumbar pedicle screws were available for analysis. Based on our postoperative CT assessment, 28 screws (5.5%; 18 thoracic screws; 10 lumbar screws) had breached the pedicle. There were 14 minor (<3 mm) and 14 major (≥3 mm) breaches. The minimally invasive technique had a significantly lower breach rate compared to open surgery (1.9% vs. 7.9%). By retrospectively analysing the intra-operative fluoroscopic images, we determined certain parameters that could predict a breach during surgery.
Pedicle breaches can still be present despite satisfactory placement of screws visualized intra-operatively. A medial breach is most likely when the length of the pedicle screw spans only up to 50% of the vertebral body as seen on the lateral view but the pedicle screw tip has already transgressed the midline as seen on an AP view. A lateral breach is likely when the tip of the pedicle screw is overlapped by the screw head or is only minimally visualized on an AP view.
尽管椎弓根螺钉置入是一种常见的手术操作,并且脊柱外科医生对该技术也很熟练,但椎弓根螺钉仍可能发生位置不当的情况。我们打算通过术后CT分析来确定,尽管术中透视显示置入情况良好,但胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉穿出的发生率。
对连续诊断为胸腰椎骨折并在透视引导下接受开放或微创后路固定的患者进行回顾性研究。分析患者的术后CT扫描结果,以确定尽管术中置入情况良好但椎弓根穿出的发生率,并确定术中评估时可预测穿出的因素。
共有61例患者的513枚胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉可供分析。根据我们的术后CT评估,28枚螺钉(5.5%;18枚胸椎螺钉;10枚腰椎螺钉)穿出了椎弓根。有14处轻微(<3 mm)穿出和14处严重(≥3 mm)穿出。与开放手术相比,微创技术的穿出率显著更低(1.9%对7.9%)。通过回顾性分析术中透视图像,我们确定了某些可在手术中预测穿出的参数。
尽管术中可见螺钉置入情况良好,但仍可能存在椎弓根穿出。从侧位片看,当椎弓根螺钉长度仅跨越椎体的50%但从前后位片看椎弓根螺钉尖端已越过中线时,最有可能发生内侧穿出。当椎弓根螺钉尖端与螺钉头部重叠或在前后位片上仅能轻微看到时,可能发生外侧穿出。