Suppr超能文献

经皮与开放椎弓根螺钉固定治疗A型胸腰椎骨折

Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures.

作者信息

Kocis Jan, Kelbl Martin, Kocis Tomas, Návrat Tomas

机构信息

Department of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Trauma Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Ponavka 6, Brno, 66250, Czech Republic.

Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb;46(1):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0998-4. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness between percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation without fusion for treating type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures. Traumatic thoracolumbar burst fracture is a common pathology without a consensus on the best treatment approach. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) systems have been recently introduced in the treatment of spinal fractures to reduce the adverse effects associated with the conventional open approaches, such as iatrogenic muscle denervation and pain.

METHODS

A prospective analysis was made to evaluate consecutive 46 patients with type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures. Patients were divided into a percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group (PPSF) and an open pedicle screw fixation group (OPSF). The mean age of patients in PPSF group (12 men, 11 woman) was 49.9 years and in OPSF group (10 men, 13 women) 52.2 years. For the purpose of evaluation, the radiological assessment of the bisegmental Cobb angle, the loss of correction, the volume of blood loss, operation time, cumulative radiation time and dose were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 12 months. There were no significant differences between OPSF and PPSF in the Cobb angle preoperative and postoperative angle and the loss of bisegmental correction. In PPSF group, the mean preoperative Cobb angle was 10.9° and improved by 4.5° postoperatively, and in OPSF group the preoperative angle was 12.1° and postoperatively improved by 3.8°. Significant differences between OPSF and PPSF were found in the mean cumulative radiation time, radiation dose and operation time. PPSF group also had a significantly lower perioperative blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Both open and percutaneous short-segment pedicle fixation were safe and effective methods to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures. Percutaneous fixation without fusion seems to be suitable for type A3 and A4 fractures.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估经皮与切开椎弓根螺钉内固定非融合治疗A3型和A4型胸腰椎骨折的疗效。创伤性胸腰椎爆裂骨折是一种常见病症,对于最佳治疗方法尚无共识。经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定(PPSF)系统最近已被引入脊柱骨折的治疗,以减少与传统切开手术相关的不良影响,如医源性肌肉去神经支配和疼痛。

方法

对连续46例A3型和A4型胸腰椎骨折患者进行前瞻性分析。患者分为经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定组(PPSF)和切开椎弓根螺钉内固定组(OPSF)。PPSF组患者(12例男性,11例女性)平均年龄为49.9岁,OPSF组患者(10例男性,13例女性)平均年龄为52.2岁。为进行评估,记录并比较双节段Cobb角、矫正丢失、失血量、手术时间、累计辐射时间和剂量的影像学评估结果。

结果

所有患者均随访12个月。OPSF组和PPSF组在术前和术后Cobb角以及双节段矫正丢失方面无显著差异。PPSF组术前平均Cobb角为10.9°,术后改善4.5°,OPSF组术前角度为12.1°,术后改善3.8°。OPSF组和PPSF组在平均累计辐射时间、辐射剂量和手术时间方面存在显著差异。PPSF组围手术期失血量也显著更低。

结论

切开和经皮短节段椎弓根固定都是治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折的安全有效方法。经皮非融合固定似乎适用于A3型和A4型骨折。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验