• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特阿拉伯年轻人的足部姿势指数参考值及其与人体测量学指标、平衡、功能性移动能力和过度活动度的关系。

Foot Posture Index Reference Values among Young Adults in Saudi Arabia and Their Association with Anthropometric Determinants, Balance, Functional Mobility, and Hypermobility.

机构信息

Department of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2021 Mar 28;2021:8844356. doi: 10.1155/2021/8844356. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/8844356
PMID:33855085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8019632/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The foot posture index (FPI) is a valid, reliable, and multidimensional method for determining foot posture in a wide range of clinical settings. To date, no normative data of healthy young adults in Saudi Arabia have been available for comparison and reference. Hence, this study is aimed at establishing the FPI reference values, gender, and side differences of FPI and their association with anthropometric determinants, balance, functional mobility, and hypermobility.

METHODS

FPI was assessed in 581 (291 men and 290 women) healthy young adults aged 18-25 years. The FPI range was obtained for both feet as the sum of the scores (-2, -1, 0, 1, and 2) given to each criterion: (-1 to -12) supinated foot, (0 to +5) neutral foot, and (+6 to +12) pronated foot. The study furthermore assessed the balance using a near tandem balance test, functional mobility by stair ascent and descent test, and joint hypermobility via the Beighton scale.

RESULTS

The average FPI score was 2.76 ± 5.23 for all subjects, 2.98 ± 5.02 for men and 2.55 ± 5.43 for women. Neutral foot posture was most frequent in this study (52.9%). A higher proportion of women had pronated (21.0%) and supinated (11.7%) feet than men which were 16.8% and 10.3%, respectively. This study also confirmed that side differences were found to be significant ( value < 0.001), whereas gender differences were significant only in the normal, pronated, and supinated foot groups.

CONCLUSION

The most common foot posture in both genders was ranged from neutral to slight pronation. We also found a correlation between balance with FPI in the supinated and hypersupinated foot groups, functional mobility with FPI of pronated and supinated foot groups, and joint hypermobility with FPI of the hyperpronated foot group.

摘要

背景

足姿态指数(FPI)是一种在广泛的临床环境中确定足姿态的有效、可靠且多维的方法。迄今为止,尚无沙特阿拉伯健康年轻成年人的 FPI 参考值的相关数据可供比较和参考。因此,本研究旨在建立 FPI 参考值、性别和 FPI 的侧别差异及其与人体测量学指标、平衡、功能性移动性和过度活动度的相关性。

方法

对 581 名(291 名男性和 290 名女性)18-25 岁健康年轻成年人进行 FPI 评估。FPI 范围是通过对每个标准的评分(-2、-1、0、1 和 2)求和得出的,范围为 (-1 至-12) 旋前足、(0 至+5) 中立足和 (+6 至+12) 旋后足。该研究还通过近并足平衡测试评估平衡、通过登梯试验评估功能性移动性以及通过 Beighton 量表评估关节过度活动度。

结果

所有受试者的平均 FPI 评分为 2.76±5.23,男性为 2.98±5.02,女性为 2.55±5.43。在本研究中,中立足姿态最为常见(52.9%)。与男性相比,女性的旋后(21.0%)和旋前(11.7%)足比例更高,分别为 16.8%和 10.3%。本研究还证实,侧别差异具有统计学意义( value < 0.001),而性别差异仅在正常、旋后和旋前足组中具有统计学意义。

结论

两性中最常见的足姿态范围从中立到轻度旋后。我们还发现,在旋前和过度旋前足组中,平衡与 FPI 之间存在相关性,在旋后和旋前足组中,功能性移动性与 FPI 之间存在相关性,在过度旋后足组中,关节过度活动度与 FPI 之间存在相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/176c/8019632/397bf507bb0d/BMRI2021-8844356.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/176c/8019632/397bf507bb0d/BMRI2021-8844356.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/176c/8019632/397bf507bb0d/BMRI2021-8844356.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Foot Posture Index Reference Values among Young Adults in Saudi Arabia and Their Association with Anthropometric Determinants, Balance, Functional Mobility, and Hypermobility.沙特阿拉伯年轻人的足部姿势指数参考值及其与人体测量学指标、平衡、功能性移动能力和过度活动度的关系。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Mar 28;2021:8844356. doi: 10.1155/2021/8844356. eCollection 2021.
2
The foot posture index: anthropometric determinants and influence of sex.足部姿势指数:人体测量学决定因素及性别影响
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2013 Sep-Oct;103(5):400-4. doi: 10.7547/1030400.
3
Toe flexor strength is associated with mobility in older adults with pronated and supinated feet but not with neutral feet.足跖屈肌力量与老年人的活动能力相关,无论其足是内翻还是外翻,而非中立位。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Sep 11;13(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00422-y.
4
Influence of Age, Sex, and Anthropometric Determinants on the Foot Posture Index in a Pediatric Population.年龄、性别和人体测量学因素对儿童足部姿势指数的影响。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2017 Mar;107(2):124-129. doi: 10.7547/14-097.
5
Can the Foot Posture Index or their individual criteria predict dynamic plantar pressures?足部姿势指数或其各项标准能否预测动态足底压力?
Gait Posture. 2012 Jul;36(3):591-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.05.024. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
6
The influence of gender and body mass index on the FPI-6 evaluated foot posture of 10- to 14-year-old school children in São Paulo, Brazil: a cross-sectional study.性别和体重指数对巴西圣保罗10至14岁学童FPI-6评估的足部姿势的影响:一项横断面研究。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Jun 27;10:1. doi: 10.1186/s13047-016-0183-0. eCollection 2017.
7
Foot posture development in children aged 5 to11 years: A three-year prospective study.5至11岁儿童足部姿势发育:一项为期三年的前瞻性研究。
Gait Posture. 2018 May;62:280-284. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.032. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
8
Establishing normative foot posture index values for the paediatric population: a cross-sectional study.建立儿科人群的标准足姿势指数值:一项横断面研究。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2016 Jul 26;9:24. doi: 10.1186/s13047-016-0156-3. eCollection 2016.
9
[Plantar pressure platform as clinical assesment tool in the analysis of foot posture with the foot posture index].[足底压力平台作为采用足姿势指数分析足部姿势的临床评估工具]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2014 Feb;152(1):68-73. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1360336. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
10
Normative values for the foot posture index between right and left foot: a descriptive study.左右脚足弓指数的正常值:一项描述性研究。
Gait Posture. 2013 Sep;38(4):843-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Aquatic-Based Resistance, Balance, and Proprioceptive Training on Ankle-Foot Malalignments in Postmenopausal Obese Women.水上抗阻、平衡及本体感觉训练对绝经后肥胖女性踝足畸形的影响
Cureus. 2025 Jul 8;17(7):e87571. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87571. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
The Relationship Between Foot Posture, Validated Foot and Ankle Tests, and Hypermobility in Paediatric Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.儿童人群中足姿势、经过验证的足踝测试与关节过度活动之间的关系:一项横断面研究
J Paediatr Child Health. 2025 Jul;61(7):1095-1101. doi: 10.1111/jpc.70084. Epub 2025 May 10.
3
Analyzing Foot Posture Malalignments in Obese Individuals.

本文引用的文献

1
Determine real change in performance during single session of functional testing.确定功能测试单次会话期间性能的实际变化。
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2019 Jun 1;19(2):215-219.
2
Inter- and intra-rater reliability for measurement of range of motion in joints included in three hypermobility assessment methods.三种关节过度活动评估方法中所包含关节活动范围测量的评分者间信度和评分者内信度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Oct 17;19(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2290-5.
3
Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores for the short physical performance battery, one-legged standing test and timed up and go test in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
分析肥胖个体的足部姿势失调情况。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 20;17(2):e79373. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79373. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Present but Ignored: Physical Condition and Health-Related Quality of Life in College-Aged Females with Generalized Joint Hypermobility.存在却被忽视:患有全身性关节过度活动综合征的大学适龄女性的身体状况及与健康相关的生活质量
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 23;12(11):1065. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12111065.
5
A Review of Anthropometric Measurements for Saudi Adults and Elderly, Directions for Future Work and Recommendations to Establish Saudi Guidelines in Line with the Saudi 2030 Vision.沙特成年人和老年人人体测量学综述、未来工作方向以及符合沙特2030愿景制定沙特指南的建议
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 8;11(14):1982. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11141982.
6
Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Technique versus Static Stretching in Patients with Pronated Dominant Foot: A Comparison in Effectiveness on Flexibility, Foot Posture, Foot Function Index, and Dynamic Balance.器械辅助软组织松动术与静态拉伸对旋前足优势侧患者的疗效比较:对灵活性、足部姿势、足部功能指数和动态平衡的有效性对比
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 7;11(6):785. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060785.
血液透析患者短体适能电池、单腿站立测试和计时起立行走测试的重测信度和最小可检测变化分数。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 22;13(8):e0201035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201035. eCollection 2018.
4
Effect of static foot posture on the dynamic stiffness of foot joints during walking.静态足部姿势对步行过程中足部关节动态刚度的影响。
Gait Posture. 2018 May;62:241-246. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
5
Foot posture is associated with plantar pressure during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet.足部姿势与步态期间的足底压力相关:正常足、扁平足和高弓足的比较。
Gait Posture. 2018 May;62:235-240. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
6
The influence of gender and body mass index on the FPI-6 evaluated foot posture of 10- to 14-year-old school children in São Paulo, Brazil: a cross-sectional study.性别和体重指数对巴西圣保罗10至14岁学童FPI-6评估的足部姿势的影响:一项横断面研究。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Jun 27;10:1. doi: 10.1186/s13047-016-0183-0. eCollection 2017.
7
The effect of various degrees of foot posture on standing balance in a healthy adult population.不同程度足部姿势对健康成年人群站立平衡的影响。
Somatosens Mot Res. 2015;32(3):172-6. doi: 10.3109/08990220.2015.1029608. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
8
Normal values of the Foot Posture Index in a young adult Spanish population: a cross-sectional study.西班牙年轻成年人足部姿势指数的正常值:一项横断面研究。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2015 Jan-Feb;105(1):42-6. doi: 10.7547/8750-7315-105.1.42.
9
Foot posture as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.足部姿势作为下肢过度使用损伤的风险因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2014 Dec 19;7(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13047-014-0055-4. eCollection 2014.
10
The relationship among foot posture, core and lower extremity muscle function, and postural stability.足部姿势、核心及下肢肌肉功能与姿势稳定性之间的关系。
J Athl Train. 2014 Mar-Apr;49(2):173-80. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.2.02. Epub 2014 Feb 25.