Hoogeslag Roy A G, Buitenhuis Margje B, Brouwer Reinoud W, Derks Rosalie P H, van Raak Sjoerd M, Veld Rianne Huis In 't
Centre for Orthopaedic Surgery OCON, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Mar 29;9(3):2325967121992472. doi: 10.1177/2325967121992472. eCollection 2021 Mar.
There has been renewed interest in the concept of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) suture repair (ACLSR). Morphologic characteristics of the ruptured ACL remnant play a role in deciding whether a patient is eligible for ACLSR. However, no classification of these characteristics of ACL rupture on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans has yet been compared with intraoperative findings in the context of ACLSR.
To investigate the value of using preoperative MRI to predict specific characteristics of acute complete ACL rupture.
Cohort study (diagnostic); Level of evidence, 2.
A total of 25 patients were included. Two radiologists classified ACL rupture location and pattern on preoperative 1.5-T MRI scans with a standard sequence; the results were compared with the corresponding findings at arthroscopy conducted by a single surgeon. The agreement between the MRI and surgical findings was calculated using Cohen κ values. Furthermore, the reliability coefficients of the MRI classifications within and between radiologists were calculated.
The agreement between MRI classification and arthroscopic findings for ACL rupture location was slight (Cohen κ, 0.016 [radiologist 1] and 0.087 [radiologist 2]), and for ACL rupture pattern, this was poor to slight (Cohen κ, <0 and 0.074). The intraobserver reliability of MRI classification for ACL rupture location was moderate for radiologist 1 and slight for radiologist 2 (Cohen κ, 0.526 and 0.061, respectively), and for ACL rupture pattern, this was slight for radiologist 1 and 2 (Cohen κ, 0.051 and 0.093, respectively). The interobserver reliability of MRI classification for ACL rupture location and pattern was slight between radiologists (Cohen κ, 0.172 and 0.040, respectively).
In the current study, we found poor to slight agreement between MRI classification and arthroscopic findings of specific ACL rupture characteristics. In addition, the intra- and interobserver reliability for MRI classification of the ACL rupture characteristics was slight to moderate.
前交叉韧带(ACL)缝合修复(ACLSR)的概念再次引起了人们的关注。ACL断裂残端的形态学特征在决定患者是否适合ACLSR方面发挥着作用。然而,在ACLSR的背景下,尚未将磁共振成像(MRI)扫描中这些ACL断裂特征的分类与术中发现进行比较。
探讨术前MRI预测急性完全性ACL断裂特定特征的价值。
队列研究(诊断性);证据等级,2级。
共纳入25例患者。两名放射科医生使用标准序列对术前1.5-T MRI扫描的ACL断裂位置和模式进行分类;将结果与由一名外科医生进行的关节镜检查的相应发现进行比较。使用Cohen κ值计算MRI与手术结果之间的一致性。此外,计算放射科医生内部和之间MRI分类的可靠性系数。
MRI分类与关节镜检查结果在ACL断裂位置方面的一致性为轻微(Cohen κ,放射科医生1为0.016,放射科医生2为0.087),在ACL断裂模式方面,一致性为差至轻微(Cohen κ,<0和0.074)。放射科医生1对ACL断裂位置的MRI分类观察者内可靠性为中等,放射科医生2为轻微(Cohen κ,分别为0.526和0.061),对于ACL断裂模式,放射科医生1和2均为轻微(Cohen κ,分别为0.051和0.093)。放射科医生之间对ACL断裂位置和模式的MRI分类观察者间可靠性为轻微(Cohen κ,分别为0.172和0.040)。
在本研究中,我们发现MRI分类与特定ACL断裂特征的关节镜检查结果之间的一致性为差至轻微。此外,ACL断裂特征的MRI分类的观察者内和观察者间可靠性为轻微至中等。