Suppr超能文献

探索在逆境环境中针对抑郁症女性的复杂干预措施的影响:南非 COURRAGE-plus 的初步可行性研究。

Exploring the impact of a complex intervention for women with depression in contexts of adversity: A pilot feasibility study of COURRAGE-plus in South Africa.

机构信息

Institute for Global health, University College London, UK.

Department of Social Work, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;68(4):873-880. doi: 10.1177/00207640211010203. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression is a leading cause of disease burden worldwide but is often undertreated in low- and middle-income countries. Reasons behind the treatment gap vary, but many highlight a lack of interventions which speak to the socio-economic and structural realties that are associated to mental health problems in many settings, including South Africa. The COURRAGE-PLUS intervention responds to this gap, by combining a collective narrative therapy (9 weeks) intervention, with a social intervention promoting group-led practical action against structural determinants of poor mental health (4 weeks), for a total of 13 sessions. The overall aim is to promote mental health, while empowering communities to acknowledge, and respond in locally meaningful ways to social adversity linked to development of mental distress.

AIM

To pilot and evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention - COURRAGE-PLUS on symptoms of depression as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) among a sample of women facing contexts of adversity in Gauteng, South Africa.

METHODS

PHQ-9 scores were assessed at baseline, post collective narrative therapy (midline), and post social intervention (endline). Median scores and corresponding interquartile ranges were computed for all time points. Differences in scores between time points were tested with a non-parametric Friedman test. The impact across symptom severities was compared descriptively to identify potential differences in impact across categories of symptom severity within our sample.

RESULTS

Participants' ( = 47) median depression score at baseline was 11 (IQR = 7) and reduced to 4 at midline (IQR = 7) to 0 at endline (IQR = 2.5). The Friedman test showed a statistically significant difference between depression scores across time points, (2) = 49.29,  < .001. Median depression scores were reduced to 0 or 1 Post-Intervention across all four severity groups.

CONCLUSIONS

COURRAGE-PLUS was highly effective at reducing symptoms of depression across the spectrum of severities in this sample of women facing adversity, in Gauteng, South Africa. Findings supports the need for larger trials to investigate collective narrative storytelling and social interventions as community-based interventions for populations experiencing adversity and mental distress.

摘要

背景

抑郁症是全球疾病负担的主要原因,但在中低收入国家往往治疗不足。治疗差距的背后有多种原因,但许多原因都强调缺乏针对与许多环境中心理健康问题相关的社会经济和结构性现实的干预措施,包括南非。COURRAGE-PLUS 干预措施正是针对这一差距,将集体叙事疗法(9 周)干预与促进以团体为基础的针对不良心理健康结构决定因素的实际行动的社会干预措施(4 周)相结合,共 13 次。总体目标是促进心理健康,同时使社区能够认识到并以对与发展精神困扰相关的社会逆境做出有意义的本地回应。

目的

在南非豪登省面临逆境的妇女样本中,试点和评估 COURRAGE-PLUS 这一复杂干预措施对抑郁症状(用患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)评估)的有效性。

方法

在基线、集体叙事治疗后(中值)和社会干预后(终值)评估 PHQ-9 评分。为所有时间点计算中位数评分和相应的四分位距。使用非参数 Friedman 检验测试时间点之间的评分差异。通过描述性比较评估症状严重程度的影响,以确定我们样本中症状严重程度类别内的潜在影响差异。

结果

参与者( = 47)基线时的抑郁中位数评分为 11(IQR = 7),中值时降至 4(IQR = 7),终值时降至 0(IQR = 2.5)。Friedman 检验显示时间点之间的抑郁评分存在统计学显著差异,(2) = 49.29,  < .001。在所有四个严重程度组中,干预后抑郁中位数评分降至 0 或 1。

结论

在南非豪登省面临逆境的妇女样本中,COURRAGE-PLUS 在整个严重程度范围内对降低抑郁症状非常有效。研究结果支持需要进行更大规模的试验,以调查集体叙事故事和社会干预措施作为针对经历逆境和精神困扰的人群的基于社区的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ca5/9014762/be46353bf72c/10.1177_00207640211010203-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验