Cardiology Department, Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Cardiology Department, CIBERCV, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct;98(4):E617-E625. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29703. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
Very few data exist on percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVr) in unstable patients with concomitant moderate-severe mitral regurgitation (MR). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate baseline characteristics, management and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients undergoing PMVr with MitraClip.
We conducted a systematic review of the published data on MitraClip from its first use in 2003 to December 2020. Studies referring to critically ill patients in cardiogenic shock or acute refractory pulmonary edema were included. A total of 40 publications including 254 patients with significant MR (Grade 4 in 91%) were included.
Mean age was 70 ± 12 years with mean Euroscore II and STS of 21 ± 13 and 20.5 ± 16, respectively. Clinical presentation was with cardiogenic shock and acute myocardial infarction in 72.8 and 60.0% of patients, respectively. Device success was achieved in 238 (93.7%) patients with a significant reduction in MR (Grade ≤ 2 in 91.8%, p < .001). The median weaning time from the procedure, to discontinuation of mechanical circulatory or respiratory support, was 2 days (IQR 1-4), with an in-hospital mortality and non-fatal complication rate of 12.6 and 9.1%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated an overall mortality rate of 39.1% at 12-month follow-up, with persistent reduction in MR severity for survivors (Grade ≤ 2 in 81.3%) and one case of mitral valve reintervention.
Percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip device is a technically feasible and potentially viable management option in high-risk patients with cardiogenic shock or refractory pulmonary edema and concomitant moderate-severe MR. Prospective trials are required to confirm these findings, and definitively determine the value of MitraClip in hemodynamically unstable patients.
在合并中重度二尖瓣反流(MR)且不稳定的患者中,经皮二尖瓣修复(PMVR)的数据非常有限。本系统评价的目的是评估行 MitraClip 二尖瓣修复术的危重症患者的基线特征、处理方法和临床结局。
我们对 2003 年首次使用 MitraClip 以来至 2020 年 12 月发表的 MitraClip 数据进行了系统评价。纳入提及心源性休克或急性难治性肺水肿的危重症患者的研究。共纳入 40 项研究,包括 254 例严重 MR(91%为 4 级)患者。
平均年龄为 70±12 岁,Euroscore II 和 STS 平均分别为 21±13 和 20.5±16。临床表现分别为心源性休克和急性心肌梗死,占比分别为 72.8%和 60.0%。238 例(93.7%)患者实现了器械成功,MR 显著降低(91.8%为≤2 级,p<0.001)。从手术到停止机械循环或呼吸支持的中位拔管时间为 2 天(IQR 1-4),住院死亡率和非致死性并发症发生率分别为 12.6%和 9.1%。Kaplan-Meier 曲线估计 12 个月随访时的总体死亡率为 39.1%,幸存者的 MR 严重程度持续降低(81.3%为≤2 级),且有 1 例二尖瓣再介入。
在合并心源性休克或难治性肺水肿且伴有中重度 MR 的高危患者中,MitraClip 装置的经皮二尖瓣修复术是一种可行且有潜在可能的治疗选择。需要前瞻性试验来证实这些发现,并确定 MitraClip 在血流动力学不稳定患者中的价值。