Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 193# Lianhe Road, Shahekou District, Dalian, 116011, China.
Department of Graduate school, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Mar;63(2):311-321. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-00994-0. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
Coronary sinus-related arrhythmias are common; however, it is difficult to perform radiofrequency (RF) ablation at these sites efficiently and safely. High-power, short-duration ablation (HPSD) is a proven alternative strategy for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI); whether it can be applied to ablation of the coronary sinus is unknown. The purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of HPSD ablation in the coronary sinus.
Firstly, we demonstrated 4 clinical cases of 3 types of arrhythmias who had unsuccessful ablation with standard power initially, but received successful ablations with HPSD. Secondly, RF ablation was performed in the coronary sinus ostium (CSO) and middle cardiac vein (MCV) of 4 in vitro swine hearts. Two protocols were compared: HPSD (45 W/5 S×5 rounds) and a conventional strategy that used low-power, long-duration ablation (LPLD: 25 W/10 S ×5 rounds). The total duration of HPSD protocol was 25 s, and which of LPLD was 50 s.
A total of 28 lesions were created. HPSD can produce longer, wider, deeper, and larger lesions than LPLD. This difference was more pronounced when the ablation was in the MCV. One instance of steam pop occurred during LPLD in the MCV.
HPSD is an effective alternative strategy for ablation in coronary sinus according to clinical applications and preliminary animal study. However, the safety needs to be further evaluated based on more animal and clinical studies.
冠状窦相关心律失常很常见;然而,在这些部位进行射频(RF)消融既困难又不安全。高能短时间消融(HPSD)是一种已被证实的肺静脉隔离(PVI)替代策略;是否可以将其应用于冠状窦消融尚不清楚。本初步研究的目的是评估 HPSD 消融在冠状窦中的可行性和安全性。
首先,我们展示了 4 例 3 种心律失常患者的临床病例,这些患者最初使用标准功率进行消融但未成功,而使用 HPSD 则获得了成功消融。其次,我们在 4 个离体猪心的冠状窦口(CSO)和心中部静脉(MCV)中进行 RF 消融。比较了两种方案:HPSD(45 W/5 S×5 轮)和使用低功率长时间消融(LPLD:25 W/10 S×5 轮)的常规策略。HPSD 方案的总持续时间为 25 s,LPLD 的总持续时间为 50 s。
共创建了 28 个病灶。HPSD 产生的病灶比 LPLD 更长、更宽、更深、更大。在 MCV 中进行消融时,这种差异更为明显。在 MCV 中进行 LPLD 时,有 1 例出现蒸汽爆裂。
根据临床应用和初步动物研究,HPSD 是冠状窦消融的有效替代策略。然而,需要进一步通过更多的动物和临床研究来评估安全性。