Salló Zoltán, Perge Péter, Balogi Bernadett, Orbán Gábor, Piros Katalin, Herczeg Szilvia, Nagy Klaudia Vivien, Osztheimer István, Ábrahám Pál, Merkely Béla, Gellér László, Szegedi Nándor
Heart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 7;9:935705. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.935705. eCollection 2022.
High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation has been proposed to produce rapid and effective lesions for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We aimed to evaluate the procedural characteristics and the first-pass isolation (FPI) rate of HPSD and very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) ablation compared to the low-power long-duration (LPLD) ablation technique.
One hundred fifty-six patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled and assigned to LPLD, HPSD, or vHPSD PVI. The energy setting was 30, 50, and 90 W in the LPLD, HPSD, and vHPSD groups, respectively. In the vHPSD group, 90 W/4 s energy delivery was used in the QMODE+ setting. In the other groups, ablation index-guided applications were delivered with 30 W (LPLD) or 50 W (HPSD).
Bilateral PVI was achieved in all cases. Compared to the LPLD group, the HPSD and vHPSD groups had shorter procedure time [85 (75-101) min, 79 (65-91) min, and 70 (53-83) min], left atrial dwelling time [61 (55-70) min, 53 (41-56) min, and 45 (34-52) min], total RF time [1,567 (1,366-1,761) s, 1,398 (1,021-1,711) s, and 336 (247-386) s], but higher bilateral FPI rate (57, 78, and 80%) (all -values < 0.01). The use of HPSD (OR = 2.72, 95% CI 1.15-6.44, = 0.023) and vHPSD (OR = 2.90, 95% CI 1.24-6.44, = 0.014) ablation techniques were associated with a higher probability of bilateral FPI. The 9-month AF-recurrence rate was lower in case of HPSD and vHPSD compared to LPLD ablation (10, 8, and 36%, = 0.0001). Moreover, the presence of FPI was associated with a lower AF-recurrence rate at 9-month (OR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.24, = 0.0001).
Our prospective, observational cohort study showed that both HPSD and vHPSD RF ablation shortens procedure and RF time and results in a higher rate of FPI compared to LPLD ablation. Moreover, the use of HPSD and vHPSD ablation increased the acute and mid-term success rate. No safety concerns were raised for HPSD or vHPSD ablation in our study.
高功率短持续时间(HPSD)射频消融已被提议用于产生快速有效的病灶以进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)。我们旨在评估HPSD和超高功率短持续时间(vHPSD)消融与低功率长持续时间(LPLD)消融技术相比的手术特征和首次通过隔离(FPI)率。
156例房颤(AF)患者入组并被分配接受LPLD、HPSD或vHPSD PVI。LPLD、HPSD和vHPSD组的能量设置分别为30、50和90W。在vHPSD组中,在QMODE +设置下使用90W/4s的能量输送。在其他组中,以30W(LPLD)或50W(HPSD)进行消融指数引导的应用。
所有病例均实现双侧PVI。与LPLD组相比,HPSD和vHPSD组的手术时间更短[85(75 - 101)分钟、79(65 - 91)分钟和70(53 - 83)分钟],左心房停留时间更短[61(55 - 70)分钟、53(41 - 56)分钟和45(34 - 52)分钟],总射频时间更短[1567(1366 - 1761)秒、1398(1021 - 1711)秒和336(247 - 386)秒],但双侧FPI率更高(57%、78%和80%)(所有P值<0.01)。使用HPSD(OR = 2.72,95%CI为1.15 - 6.44,P = 0.023)和vHPSD(OR = 2.90,95%CI为1.24 - 6.44,P = 0.014)消融技术与双侧FPI的更高概率相关。与LPLD消融相比,HPSD和vHPSD情况下9个月的房颤复发率更低(10%、8%和36%,P = 0.0001)。此外,FPI与9个月时较低的房颤复发率相关(OR = 0.09,95%CI为0.04 - 0.24,P = 0.0001)。
我们的前瞻性观察队列研究表明,与LPLD消融相比,HPSD和vHPSD射频消融均缩短了手术和射频时间,并导致更高的FPI率。此外,使用HPSD和vHPSD消融提高了急性和中期成功率。在我们的研究中,未对HPSD或vHPSD消融提出安全性担忧。