Suppr超能文献

真假回忆的连续源恢复模型。

A continuous source reinstatement model of true and false recollection.

作者信息

Johns Brendan T, Jones Michael N, Mewhort Douglas J K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McGill University.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 2021 Mar;75(1):1-18. doi: 10.1037/cep0000237.

Abstract

In studies of false recognition, subjects not only endorse items that they have never seen, but they also make subjective judgments that they remember consciously experiencing them. This is a difficult problem for most models of recognition memory, as they propose that false memories should be based on familiarity, not recollection. We present a new computational model of recollection, based on the Recognition through Semantic Synchronization (RSS) model of Johns, Jones, & Mewhort (Cognitive Psychology, 2012, 65, 486), and fuzzy trace theory (Brainerd & Reyna, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2002, 11, 164), that offers a solution to this problem. In addition to standard true and false recognition results, the model successfully extends to explain multiple studies on both true and false recollection. This work suggests that recollection does not have to be thought of as a separate process from recognition, but instead as one that is reliant upon different information sources. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

在错误识别研究中,受试者不仅认可他们从未见过的项目,还会做出主观判断,称自己有意识地记得体验过这些项目。这对大多数识别记忆模型来说都是一个难题,因为这些模型认为错误记忆应基于熟悉度,而非回忆。我们基于约翰斯、琼斯和梅霍特(《认知心理学》,2012年,第65卷,第486页)的语义同步识别(RSS)模型以及模糊痕迹理论(布雷纳德和雷纳,《心理科学当前发展方向》,2002年,第11卷,第164页),提出了一种新的回忆计算模型,该模型为这一问题提供了解决方案。除了标准的正确和错误识别结果外,该模型还成功扩展到解释多项关于正确和错误回忆的研究。这项工作表明,回忆不必被视为与识别不同的过程,而是一个依赖于不同信息源的过程。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验