Kaunitz A M, Masciello A, Ostrowski M, Rovira E Z
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, University Hospital of Jacksonville 32209.
J Reprod Med. 1988 May;33(5):427-31.
Endometrial biopsy can be used to evaluate women at high risk for endometrial cancer and to follow women on hormone replacement therapy. Biopsy methods may produce enough pain, however, to lower patient acceptance. The Endometrial Pipelle is a new plastic endometrial suction curette that provides a histologic biopsy. This study compared the performance of the Pipelle to that of the Vabra aspirator, a widely accepted biopsy device. Endometrial sampling using both techniques was performed on 56 patients. Both instruments provided the correct diagnosis in 50 patients (89%). The Pipelle obtained more tissue than the Vabra in 28 patients (50%) and was noted by the clinician to cause less pain in 50 patients (89%). Forty-seven patients (84%) stated that biopsy with the Pipelle was less painful than with the Vabra. These results suggest that the Pipelle is as efficacious as the Vabra aspirator and has greater patient acceptability.
子宫内膜活检可用于评估子宫内膜癌高危女性,并对接受激素替代疗法的女性进行随访。然而,活检方法可能会产生足够的疼痛,从而降低患者的接受度。子宫内膜取样管是一种新型塑料子宫内膜抽吸刮匙,可提供组织学活检。本研究将取样管的性能与广泛使用的活检设备Vabra抽吸器进行了比较。对56例患者使用这两种技术进行子宫内膜取样。两种器械在50例患者(89%)中都做出了正确诊断。取样管在28例患者(50%)中获取的组织比Vabra抽吸器更多,临床医生指出取样管在50例患者(89%)中引起的疼痛更少。47例患者(84%)表示,使用取样管进行活检比使用Vabra抽吸器疼痛更轻。这些结果表明,取样管与Vabra抽吸器一样有效,并且患者接受度更高。