HAVAE EA6310 (Handicap, Aging, Autonomy, Environment), IFRH, University of Limoges, 87042 Limoges, France; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital Center of Limoges, 87042 Limoges, France.
HAVAE EA6310 (Handicap, Aging, Autonomy, Environment), IFRH, University of Limoges, 87042 Limoges, France; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital Center of Limoges, 87042 Limoges, France.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Jan;65(1):101514. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101514. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
To report all equations that can potentially be used to estimate the oxygen cost of walking (Cw) without using a respiratory gas exchange analyzer and to provide the level of reliability of each equation.
Webline, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE), and Wiley Online Library databases from 1950 to August 2019 with search terms related to stroke and oxygen cost of walking.
This systematic review was reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the methodological quality of included studies was determined with the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP).
We screened 2065 articles, and 33 were included for full-text analysis. Four articles were included in the data synthesis (stroke individuals=184). Analysis reported 4 equations estimating Cw that were developed from logistic regression equations between Cw and self-selected walking speed. The equations differed in several methodological aspects (characteristics of individuals, type of equation, Cw reference measurement methods). The Compagnat et al. study had the highest quality (CASP score=9/9).
This literature review highlighted 4 equations for estimating Cw from self-selected walking speed. Compagnat et al. presented the best quality parameters, but this work involved a population restricted to individuals with hemispheric stroke sequelae.
报告所有可能用于估算无呼吸气体交换分析仪的步行耗氧量（Cw）的方程式，并提供每个方程式的可靠性水平。
从 1950 年到 2019 年 8 月，通过与中风和步行耗氧量相关的检索词，在 Webline、Medline、Scopus、ScienceDirect、Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) 和 Wiley Online Library 数据库中进行了检索。
本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目（PRISMA）指南进行报告，并使用批判性评估技能计划（CASP）确定纳入研究的方法学质量。
我们筛选了 2065 篇文章，其中 33 篇进行了全文分析。有 4 篇文章纳入了数据综合分析（中风患者=184 人）。分析报告了 4 个估算 Cw 的方程式，这些方程式是从 Cw 与自我选择的步行速度之间的逻辑回归方程式中得出的。这些方程式在几个方法学方面存在差异（个体特征、方程式类型、Cw 参考测量方法）。Compagnat 等人的研究具有最高的质量（CASP 评分=9/9）。
本文献综述强调了从自我选择的步行速度估算 Cw 的 4 个方程式。Compagnat 等人提出了最佳质量参数，但这项工作涉及的人群仅限于有半球性中风后遗症的个体。
