Suppr超能文献

从 2 级创伤中心转为 1 级创伤中心后创伤结局:国家创伤数据库分析。

Trauma Center Outcomes After Transition From Level 2 to Level 1: A National Trauma Data Bank Analysis.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:499-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous US-based studies have shown that a trauma center designation of level 1 is associated with improved patient outcomes. However, most studies are cross-sectional, focus on volume-related issues and are direct comparisons between levels. This study investigates the change in patient characteristics when individual trauma centers transition from level 2 to level 1 and whether the patients have similar outcomes during the initial period of the transition.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study that analyzed hospital and patient records included in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2007 to 2016. Patient characteristics were compared before and after their hospitals transitioned their trauma level. Mortality; complications including acute kidney injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac arrest with CPR, deep surgical site infection, deep vein thrombosis, extremity compartment syndrome, surgical site infection, osteomyelitis, pulmonary embolism, and so on; ICU admission; ventilation use; unplanned returns to the OR; unplanned ICU transfers; unplanned intubations; and lengths of stay were obtained following propensity score matching, comparing posttransition years with the last pretransition year.

RESULTS

Sixteen trauma centers transitioned from level 2 to level 1 between 2007 and 2016. One was excluded due to missing data. After transition, patient characteristics showed differences in the distribution of race, comorbidities, insurance status, injury severity scores, injury mechanisms, and injury type. After propensity score matching, patients treated in a trauma center after transition from level 2 to 1 required significantly fewer ICU admissions and had lower complication rates. However, significantly more unplanned intubations, unplanned returns to the OR, unplanned ICU transfers, ventilation use, surgical site infections, pneumonia, and urinary tract infections and higher mortality were reported after the transition.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma centers that transitioned from level 2 to level 1 had lower overall complications, with fewer patients requiring ICU admission. However, higher mortality and more surgical site infections, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, unplanned intubations, and unplanned ICU transfers were reported after the transition. These findings may have significant implications in the planning of trauma systems for administrators and healthcare leaders.

摘要

背景

之前在美国进行的研究表明,一级创伤中心的指定与改善患者预后有关。然而,大多数研究都是横断面的,侧重于与容量相关的问题,并且是在不同级别之间进行的直接比较。本研究调查了当个别创伤中心从 2 级过渡到 1 级时患者特征的变化,以及在过渡的初始阶段患者是否具有相似的结局。

研究设计

我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,分析了 2007 年至 2016 年国家创伤数据库中包含的医院和患者记录。比较了医院创伤级别转变前后患者的特征。死亡率;并发症包括急性肾损伤、急性呼吸窘迫综合征、心肺复苏后心脏骤停、深部手术部位感染、深静脉血栓形成、四肢间隔综合征、手术部位感染、骨髓炎、肺栓塞等;入住 ICU;使用呼吸机;非计划返回手术室;非计划转入 ICU;非计划插管;以及通过倾向评分匹配获得的住院时间,比较了转变后年份与最后一个转变前年份。

结果

16 家创伤中心在 2007 年至 2016 年间从 2 级过渡到 1 级。由于数据缺失,其中一家被排除在外。转变后,患者特征在种族、合并症、保险状况、损伤严重程度评分、损伤机制和损伤类型的分布上存在差异。经过倾向评分匹配后,在从 2 级过渡到 1 级的创伤中心治疗的患者,需要 ICU 入住的人数明显减少,并发症发生率也较低。然而,在过渡后,更多的患者需要非计划插管、非计划返回手术室、非计划转入 ICU、使用呼吸机、手术部位感染、肺炎和尿路感染,死亡率也更高。

结论

从 2 级过渡到 1 级的创伤中心总体并发症较少,需要 ICU 入住的患者较少。然而,在过渡后,死亡率更高,手术部位感染、肺炎、尿路感染、非计划插管和非计划 ICU 转移的发生率更高。这些发现可能对管理者和医疗保健领导者在创伤系统规划方面具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验