Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 15;11(4):e041710. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041710.
The aim of the study is to compare how member states of the European Union (EU) develop their national physical activity (PA) recommendations and to provide an overview of the methodologies they apply in doing so. Information was collected directly from the physical activity focal points of EU member states in 2018. Five countries were chosen for detailed case study analysis of development processes.
Cross-sectional survey.
The representatives of the 28 EU member state governments to the EU physical activity Focal Point Network.
From national documents we extracted data on (1) the participants of the development process, (2) the different methods used during development, and (3) on which sources national PA recommendations were based. An additional survey for case study countries provided details on (1) anonymised information on the participants of development process, (2) methods employed and rationale for choosing them, (3) development process and timeline, and (4) main source documents used for recommendation development.
Eighteen national documents on PA recommendations contained information about development process. The results showed that countries used different approaches to develop national recommendations. The main strategies were (1) adoption of WHO 2010 recommendations or (2) a combination of analysis and adoption of other national and international recommendations and literature review. All of the five case study countries relied on review processes rather than directly adopting WHO recommendations.
While there are arguments for the use of particular strategies for PA recommendation development, there is currently no evidence for the general superiority of a specific approach. Instead, our findings highlight the broad spectrum of potential development methods, resources utilisation and final recommendations design currently available to national governments. These results may be a source of inspiration for other countries currently planning the development or update of national PA recommendations.
本研究旨在比较欧盟(EU)成员国制定国家身体活动(PA)建议的方式,并概述它们在这方面所采用的方法。信息是在 2018 年直接从欧盟成员国的 PA 重点负责人那里收集的。选择了五个国家进行详细的案例研究分析。
横断面调查。
欧盟 PA 重点负责人网络中 28 个欧盟成员国政府的代表。
从国家文件中提取了有关(1)发展过程参与者的数据,(2)发展过程中使用的不同方法,以及(3)国家 PA 建议所依据的来源。对案例研究国家的额外调查提供了有关(1)发展过程参与者的匿名信息,(2)所采用的方法及其选择的理由,(3)发展过程和时间表,以及(4)用于建议制定的主要源文件的详细信息。
18 份关于 PA 建议的国家文件包含了有关发展过程的信息。结果表明,各国采用了不同的方法来制定国家建议。主要策略是(1)采用世卫组织 2010 年建议,或(2)分析和采用其他国家和国际建议以及文献综述的组合。所有五个案例研究国家都依赖于审查过程,而不是直接采用世卫组织的建议。
虽然 PA 建议发展有采用特定策略的理由,但目前没有证据表明特定方法具有普遍优势。相反,我们的研究结果强调了目前可用于各国政府的广泛的潜在发展方法、资源利用和最终建议设计。这些结果可能为其他目前正在计划制定或更新国家 PA 建议的国家提供灵感。