Khan Jahidur Rahman, Carroll Suzanne Jane, Warner-Smith Matthew, Roder David, Daniel Mark
Australian Geospatial Health Laboratory, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
School of Health Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 15;11(4):e043853. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043853.
Participation in breast cancer screening (BCS) varies at the small-area level, which may reflect environmental influences. This study assessed small-area variation in BCS invitation response rates (IRRs) and associations between small-area BCS IRR, sociodemographic factors, BCS venue distance and venue location features in Greater Sydney, Australia.
BCS IRR data for 2011-2012 were compiled for 9528 Australian Bureau of Statistics Statistical Area Level 1 (SA1) units (n=227 474 women). A geographial information system was used to extract SA1-level sociodemographic features (proportions of women speaking English at home, full-time employed and university educated, and proportion of dwellings with motor vehicles), SA1-level distance to closest venue(s) (expressed as quartiles), and closest venue(s) colocated with bus stops, train station, hospital, general practitioner and shops. Associations between area-level features, BCS venue distance, venue location features and IRR were estimated using ordinary least square-type spatial lag models including area education as a covariate.
BCS IRR varied across SA1s (mean=59.8%, range: 0%-100%), with notable spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I=0.803). BCS IRR was positively associated with greater SA1-level proportion of women speaking English at home (β=2.283, 95% CI 2.024 to 2.543), women's education (in the model including speaking English at home β=0.454, 95% CI 0.211 to 0.697), dwellings with motor vehicles (β=1.836, 95% CI 1.594 to 2.078), greater distance to venue (eg, most distant quartile compared with closest: β=6.249, 95% CI 5.489 to 7.008), and BCS venue colocated with shops (β=0.762, 95% CI 0.273 to 1.251). Greater SA1-level women employment (β=-0.613, 95% CI -0.898 to -0.328) and venue colocated with train station (β=-1.889, 95% CI -2.376 to -1.402) or hospital (β=-0.677, 95% CI -1.164 to -0.189) were inversely related to BCS IRR.
Small-area variation in BCS IRR exists for Greater Sydney and is strongly related to sociodemographic factors that, together with BCS venue location features, could inform targeted attempts to improve IRR.
乳腺癌筛查(BCS)的参与率在小区域层面存在差异,这可能反映了环境影响。本研究评估了澳大利亚大悉尼地区BCS邀请响应率(IRR)的小区域差异,以及小区域BCS IRR、社会人口学因素、BCS场所距离和场所位置特征之间的关联。
收集了2011 - 2012年9528个澳大利亚统计局统计区1级(SA1)单位(n = 227474名女性)的BCS IRR数据。使用地理信息系统提取SA1级社会人口学特征(在家说英语的女性比例、全职就业女性比例、受过大学教育的女性比例以及有机动车的住宅比例)、SA1级到最近场所的距离(表示为四分位数),以及与公交车站、火车站、医院、全科医生诊所和商店位于同一地点的最近场所。使用普通最小二乘型空间滞后模型估计区域层面特征、BCS场所距离、场所位置特征与IRR之间的关联,并将区域教育作为协变量。
BCS IRR在SA1之间存在差异(均值 = 59.8%;范围:0% - 100%),具有显著的空间自相关性(莫兰指数I = 0.803)。BCS IRR与SA1级在家说英语的女性比例较高呈正相关(β = 2.283,95%置信区间2.024至2.543)、女性受教育程度(在包含在家说英语的模型中β = 0.454,95%置信区间0.211至0.697)、有机动车的住宅(β = 1.836,95%置信区间1.594至2.078)、到场所的距离较远(例如,与最近四分位数相比最远四分位数:β = 6.249,95%置信区间5.489至7.008)以及与商店位于同一地点的BCS场所(β = 0.762,95%置信区间0.273至1.251)呈正相关。SA1级女性就业率较高(β = -0.613,95%置信区间 - 0.898至 - 0.328)以及与火车站(β = -1.889,95%置信区间 - 2.376至 - 1.402)或医院(β = -0.677,95%置信区间 - 1.164至 - 0.189)位于同一地点的场所与BCS IRR呈负相关。
澳大利亚大悉尼地区存在BCS IRR的小区域差异,且与社会人口学因素密切相关,这些因素连同BCS场所位置特征,可为提高IRR的针对性措施提供参考。