Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Palermo, Italy.
Int J Med Sci. 2021 Mar 27;18(10):2245-2250. doi: 10.7150/ijms.54996. eCollection 2021.
Large and consistent evidence supports the use of eribulin mesylate in clinical practice in third or later line treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Conversely, there is paucity of data on eribulin efficacy in second line treatment. We investigated outcomes of 44 mTNBC patients treated from 2013 through 2019 with second line eribulin mesylate in a multicentre retrospective study involving 14 Italian oncologic centres. Median age was 51 years, with 11.4% of these patients being metastatic at diagnosis. Median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) from eribulin starting were 11.9 (95%CI: 8.4-15.5) and 3.5 months (95%CI: 1.7-5.3), respectively. We observed 8 (18.2%) partial responses and 10 (22.7%) patients had stable disease as best response. A longer PFS on previous first line treatment predicted a better OS (HR=0.87, 95%CI: 0.77-0.99, p= 0.038) and a longer PFS on eribulin treatment (HR=0.92, 95%CI: 0.85-0.98, p=0.018). Progression free survival to eribulin was also favorably influenced by prior adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.44, 95%CI: 0.22-0.88, p=0.02). Eribulin was generally well tolerated, with grade 3-4 adverse events being recorded in 15.9% of patients. The outcomes described for our cohort are consistent with those reported in the pivotal Study301 and subsequent observational studies. Further data from adequately-sized, ad hoc trials on eribulin use in second line for mTNBC are warranted to confirm our findings.
大量一致的证据支持在转移性三阴性乳腺癌(mTNBC)的三线治疗中使用甲磺酸艾日布林。相反,在二线治疗中,关于艾日布林疗效的数据很少。我们在一项涉及 14 个意大利肿瘤中心的多中心回顾性研究中,调查了 44 名 mTNBC 患者从 2013 年至 2019 年二线接受甲磺酸艾日布林治疗的结果。中位年龄为 51 岁,其中 11.4%的患者在诊断时就已经转移。从开始使用艾日布林的中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为 11.9(95%CI:8.4-15.5)和 3.5 个月(95%CI:1.7-5.3)。我们观察到 8 名(18.2%)患者部分缓解,10 名(22.7%)患者最佳反应为疾病稳定。一线治疗前较长的 PFS 预测 OS 更好(HR=0.87,95%CI:0.77-0.99,p=0.038),艾日布林治疗的 PFS 也更长(HR=0.92,95%CI:0.85-0.98,p=0.018)。艾日布林的无进展生存期也受到先前辅助化疗的有利影响(HR=0.44,95%CI:0.22-0.88,p=0.02)。艾日布林总体耐受性良好,15.9%的患者出现 3-4 级不良事件。我们的队列描述的结果与关键研究 301 和随后的观察性研究报告的结果一致。需要进一步的、专门的研究来证实二线治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌中使用艾日布林的有效性。