Suppr超能文献

与优替德隆联合卡培他滨相比,艾日布林治疗转移性乳腺癌的疗效和安全性的真实世界分析。

Real world analysis of the efficacy and safety of eribulin compared to utidelone in combination with capecitabine for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

作者信息

Feng Mengya, Bi Pingping, Kang Yihua, Yang Dechun, Ren Shengnan, Lu Xianping, Xie Guojian, Lei Hai, Mo Dan

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, The People's Hospital of Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, No. 318 Lucheng South Road, Chuxiong, 675000, Yunnan, China.

Department of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Lincang, No.116 Nantang Street, Linxiang District, Lincang, 677000, Yunnan, China.

出版信息

Cancer Cell Int. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12935-024-03608-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of subsequent chemotherapy with single eribulin or utidelone combined with a capecitabine regimen in patients with advanced breast cancer who had previously been treated with anthracyclines and paclitaxel.

METHODS

This work was a retrospective analysis of 85 patients from July 2018 to July 2023. Forty-two and 43 patients were treated with the eribulin regimen and the utidelone/capecitabine regimen, respectively. The endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, the objective remission rate and safety. Survival analyses and multifactorial analyses were performed via the Kaplan‒Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

As of 15 April 2024, the mPFS durations of the patients in the utidelone/capecitabine and eribulin treatment groups were 7.7 and 5.2 months, respectively, and the mOS durations were 22.0 and 18.2 months, respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed that in advanced first-line therapy, the mPFS durations of the utidelone/capecitabine group and the eribulin group were 11.8 and 7.0 months, respectively, and this difference was significant. In the eribulin treatment arm, the mPFS of first-line therapy was 7.0, whereas it was 3.3 months for posterior-line therapy, and this difference was significant. The most common adverse reactions were neurotoxicity, hand‒foot syndrome, hematological toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, and abnormalities in hepatic and renal functions.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, either utidelone/capecitabine or eribulin chemotherapy may result in a survival benefit with a tolerable adverse effect profile and favorable safety profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The first-line use of eribulin resulted in better PFS and ORR than posterior-line use, and the combination of utidelone/capecitabine represents a more efficacious approach in the advanced first-line therapy of breast cancer.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是比较单药艾瑞布林或长春瑞滨联合卡培他滨方案对既往接受过蒽环类药物和紫杉醇治疗的晚期乳腺癌患者进行后续化疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究对2018年7月至2023年7月期间的85例患者进行回顾性分析。分别有42例和43例患者接受了艾瑞布林方案和长春瑞滨/卡培他滨方案治疗。终点指标包括无进展生存期、总生存期、客观缓解率和安全性。通过Kaplan-Meier法、对数秩检验和Cox回归模型进行生存分析和多因素分析。

结果

截至2024年4月15日,长春瑞滨/卡培他滨治疗组和艾瑞布林治疗组患者的中位无进展生存期分别为7.7个月和5.2个月,中位总生存期分别为22.0个月和18.2个月。亚组分析显示,在晚期一线治疗中,长春瑞滨/卡培他滨组和艾瑞布林组的中位无进展生存期分别为11.8个月和7.0个月,差异具有统计学意义。在艾瑞布林治疗组中,一线治疗的中位无进展生存期为7.0个月,而后线治疗为3.3个月,差异具有统计学意义。最常见的不良反应为神经毒性、手足综合征、血液学毒性、胃肠道毒性以及肝肾功能异常。

结论

总之,长春瑞滨/卡培他滨或艾瑞布林化疗均可使转移性乳腺癌患者获得生存获益,且不良反应可耐受,安全性良好。艾瑞布林一线使用较二线使用可带来更好的无进展生存期和客观缓解率,长春瑞滨/卡培他滨联合方案在晚期乳腺癌一线治疗中疗效更佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2015/11660865/c019e5396852/12935_2024_3608_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验