Animal Sciences Department, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences of Jaboticabal. Animal Sciences Department I, São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Jaboticabal, Brazil.
J Anim Breed Genet. 2021 Sep;138(5):541-551. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12550. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
The study's objective was to compare the genomic prediction ability methods for the traits milk yield, milk composition and somatic cell count of Saanen Brazilian goats. Nine hundred forty goats, genotyped with an Axiom_OviCap (Caprine) panel, Affimetrix customized array with 62,557 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), were used for the genomic selection analyses. The genomic methods studied to estimate the effects of SNPs and direct genomic values (DGV) were as follows: (a) genomic BLUP (GBLUP), (b) Bayes Cπ and (c) Bayesian Lasso (BLASSO). Estimated breeding values (EBV) and deregressed estimated breeding values (dEBV) were used as response variables for the genomic predictions. The prediction ability was assessed by Pearson's correlation between DGV and response variables (EBV and dEBV). Regression coefficients of the response variables on the DGV were obtained to verify if the genomic predictions were biased. In addition, the mean square error of prediction (MSE) was used as a measure of verification of model fit to the data. The means of prediction accuracy, when EBV was used as a response variable, were 0.68, 0.68 and 0.67 for GBLUP, Bayes Cπ and BLASSO, respectively. With dEBV, the mean prediction accuracy was 0.50 for all models. The averages of the EBV regression coefficients on DGV were 1.08 for all models (GBLUP, Bayes Cπ and BLASSO), higher than those obtained for the regression coefficient of dEBV on DGV, which presented values of 1.05, 1.05 and 1.08 for GBLUP, Bayes Cπ and BLASSO, respectively. None of the methods stood out in terms of prediction ability; however, the GBLUP method was the most appropriate for estimating the DGV, in a slightly more reliable and less biased way, besides presenting the lowest computational cost. In the context of the present study, EBV was the preferred response variables considering the genomic prediction accuracy despite dEBV also presented lower bias.
本研究旨在比较用于评估萨能巴西山羊产奶量、乳成分和体细胞计数性状的基因组预测能力方法。使用 940 只经 Axiom_OviCap(山羊)面板、62557 个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)定制的 Affimetrix 阵列进行基因分型的山羊进行基因组选择分析。研究了用于估计 SNP 效应和直接基因组值(DGV)的基因组方法如下:(a)基因组 BLUP(GBLUP),(b)贝叶斯 Cπ和(c)贝叶斯套索(BLASSO)。估计育种值(EBV)和去回归估计育种值(dEBV)被用作基因组预测的响应变量。通过 DGV 与响应变量(EBV 和 dEBV)之间的 Pearson 相关系数评估预测能力。获得响应变量对 DGV 的回归系数,以验证基因组预测是否存在偏差。此外,预测误差的均方(MSE)也被用作验证模型对数据拟合程度的指标。当 EBV 用作响应变量时,GBLUP、Bayes Cπ和 BLASSO 的预测准确性均值分别为 0.68、0.68 和 0.67。对于 dEBV,所有模型的平均预测准确性均为 0.50。对于所有模型(GBLUP、Bayes Cπ和 BLASSO),EBV 对 DGV 的回归系数平均值为 1.08,高于 dEBV 对 DGV 的回归系数值,分别为 1.05、1.05 和 1.08。在预测能力方面,没有一种方法表现突出;然而,GBLUP 方法在以稍微更可靠和更小偏差的方式估计 DGV 方面是最合适的,并且计算成本最低。在本研究的背景下,尽管 dEBV 也呈现出较低的偏差,但考虑到基因组预测准确性,EBV 是首选的响应变量。