Acta Orthop Belg. 2020 Dec;86(4):580-587.
Traditionally, geriatric patients with musculoskeletal or osteoarticular problems will be admitted to an orthopedic ward and will be treated by sur- geons. However, these patients often suffer from comorbidities requiring geriatric management. In this study, the orthogeriatric co-management (OG- CM) model is compared to traditional orthopedic care model in a retrospective pilot study. In this study, two patients groups were compared during two similar time periods : (1) Group 1 consisted of 119 geriatric patients admitted to an orthopedic (trauma) ward who were treated, with conventional geriatric care on demand (before OG- CM ; October 1-December 31, 2013) and (2) Group 2 consisted of 132 geriatric patients who were admitted after the implementation of the OG-CM model (after OG-CM ; October 1-December 31, 2014). Outcomes measured were : quality of care outcome, mortality and costs. After the introduction of OG-CM, the number of diagnoses increased (P = 0.011) adjusting for sex, age, length of stay (LOS), urgency and getting surgery (yes/ no). However, this did not lead to a significant higher severity of illness (SOI). The number of readmissions within a year were significantly lower after OG-CM (0.31 per patient) compared to before OG-CM (0.89 per patient) (P < 0.001). No significant difference in in-house and reported mortality after 3 months was observed. Costs increased, but no significant differences were found. The OG-CM model demonstrated an increase in quality of care. This was indicated by an increased number of medical diagnoses resulting in having less readmissions, without affecting the mortality rates and the LOS. Future randomized multi-centered studies are required to enable causal relationships.
传统上,患有肌肉骨骼或骨关节炎问题的老年患者将被收治到骨科病房,并由外科医生进行治疗。然而,这些患者通常患有需要老年病管理的合并症。在这项研究中,回顾性试点研究比较了矫形老年共管(OG-CM)模式与传统的骨科护理模式。在这项研究中,比较了两个类似时间段的两组患者:(1)第 1 组包括 119 名入住骨科(创伤)病房的老年患者,他们接受了按需常规老年护理(OG-CM 之前;2013 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日)和(2)第 2 组包括 132 名在实施 OG-CM 模型后入住的老年患者(OG-CM 之后;2014 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日)。测量的结果为:护理质量结果、死亡率和成本。在引入 OG-CM 后,调整性别、年龄、住院时间(LOS)、紧急程度和手术(是/否)后,诊断数量增加(P = 0.011)。然而,这并没有导致疾病严重程度(SOI)显著增加。OG-CM 后一年内的再入院率显著降低(每位患者 0.31 次),OG-CM 前为 0.89 次(每位患者)(P < 0.001)。在 3 个月后,院内和报告的死亡率没有观察到显著差异。成本增加,但未发现显著差异。OG-CM 模式显示护理质量提高。这表现为增加了医疗诊断的数量,从而减少了再入院次数,而不会影响死亡率和 LOS。需要进行未来的随机多中心研究,以确定因果关系。