• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引入骨科老年病共管模式可提高护理质量:一项试点研究。

Introduction of the orthogeriatric co-management model increases the quality of care : a pilot study.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Belg. 2020 Dec;86(4):580-587.

PMID:33861903
Abstract

Traditionally, geriatric patients with musculoskeletal or osteoarticular problems will be admitted to an orthopedic ward and will be treated by sur- geons. However, these patients often suffer from comorbidities requiring geriatric management. In this study, the orthogeriatric co-management (OG- CM) model is compared to traditional orthopedic care model in a retrospective pilot study. In this study, two patients groups were compared during two similar time periods : (1) Group 1 consisted of 119 geriatric patients admitted to an orthopedic (trauma) ward who were treated, with conventional geriatric care on demand (before OG- CM ; October 1-December 31, 2013) and (2) Group 2 consisted of 132 geriatric patients who were admitted after the implementation of the OG-CM model (after OG-CM ; October 1-December 31, 2014). Outcomes measured were : quality of care outcome, mortality and costs. After the introduction of OG-CM, the number of diagnoses increased (P = 0.011) adjusting for sex, age, length of stay (LOS), urgency and getting surgery (yes/ no). However, this did not lead to a significant higher severity of illness (SOI). The number of readmissions within a year were significantly lower after OG-CM (0.31 per patient) compared to before OG-CM (0.89 per patient) (P < 0.001). No significant difference in in-house and reported mortality after 3 months was observed. Costs increased, but no significant differences were found. The OG-CM model demonstrated an increase in quality of care. This was indicated by an increased number of medical diagnoses resulting in having less readmissions, without affecting the mortality rates and the LOS. Future randomized multi-centered studies are required to enable causal relationships.

摘要

传统上,患有肌肉骨骼或骨关节炎问题的老年患者将被收治到骨科病房,并由外科医生进行治疗。然而,这些患者通常患有需要老年病管理的合并症。在这项研究中,回顾性试点研究比较了矫形老年共管(OG-CM)模式与传统的骨科护理模式。在这项研究中,比较了两个类似时间段的两组患者:(1)第 1 组包括 119 名入住骨科(创伤)病房的老年患者,他们接受了按需常规老年护理(OG-CM 之前;2013 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日)和(2)第 2 组包括 132 名在实施 OG-CM 模型后入住的老年患者(OG-CM 之后;2014 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日)。测量的结果为:护理质量结果、死亡率和成本。在引入 OG-CM 后,调整性别、年龄、住院时间(LOS)、紧急程度和手术(是/否)后,诊断数量增加(P = 0.011)。然而,这并没有导致疾病严重程度(SOI)显著增加。OG-CM 后一年内的再入院率显著降低(每位患者 0.31 次),OG-CM 前为 0.89 次(每位患者)(P < 0.001)。在 3 个月后,院内和报告的死亡率没有观察到显著差异。成本增加,但未发现显著差异。OG-CM 模式显示护理质量提高。这表现为增加了医疗诊断的数量,从而减少了再入院次数,而不会影响死亡率和 LOS。需要进行未来的随机多中心研究,以确定因果关系。

相似文献

1
Introduction of the orthogeriatric co-management model increases the quality of care : a pilot study.引入骨科老年病共管模式可提高护理质量:一项试点研究。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2020 Dec;86(4):580-587.
2
Elderly adults with isolated hip fractures- orthogeriatric care versus standard care: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.老年髋部骨折患者——骨科-老年科联合治疗与常规治疗:东部创伤外科学会的实践管理指南。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Feb;88(2):266-278. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002482.
3
The effect of a pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric service on cognitive function in patients with hip fracture: randomized controlled trial (Oslo Orthogeriatric Trial).术前及术后老年骨科服务对髋部骨折患者认知功能的影响:随机对照试验(奥斯陆老年骨科试验)
BMC Med. 2014 Apr 15;12:63. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-63.
4
The orthogeriatric comanagement improves clinical outcomes of hip fracture in older adults.骨科老年病学联合管理可改善老年髋部骨折患者的临床转归。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Apr;30(4):907-916. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04858-2. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
5
Orthogeriatric co-management improves the outcome of long-term care residents with fragility fractures.老年骨科联合管理可改善患有脆性骨折的长期护理机构居民的预后。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Oct;136(10):1403-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2543-4. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
[The acute orthogeriatric unit. Assessment of its effect on the clinical course of patients with hip fractures and an estimate of its financial impact].[急性老年骨科单元。评估其对髋部骨折患者临床病程的影响及其经济影响评估]
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2011 Jul-Aug;46(4):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
7
Dedicated orthogeriatric service reduces hip fracture mortality.专门的老年骨科服务可降低髋部骨折死亡率。
Ir J Med Sci. 2017 Feb;186(1):179-184. doi: 10.1007/s11845-016-1453-3. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
8
Characteristics and Outcomes of Hip Fracture Patients Hospitalized in an Orthogeriatric Unit Versus an Orthopedic Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.老年骨科病房与骨科收治的髋部骨折患者的特征及预后:一项回顾性队列研究
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Jan 10;12:2151459320986299. doi: 10.1177/2151459320986299. eCollection 2021.
9
Can improved quality of care explain the success of orthogeriatric units? A population-based cohort study.护理质量的提高能否解释老年骨科单元的成功?一项基于人群的队列研究。
Age Ageing. 2016 Jan;45(1):66-71. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv155. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
10
Time to Surgery Reduction in Hip Fracture Patients on an Integrated Orthogeriatric Unit: A Comparative Study of Three Healthcare Models.综合骨与老年科病房中髋部骨折患者的手术时间缩短:三种医疗模式的对比研究。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Apr;12(2):457-462. doi: 10.1111/os.12633. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
An Economic Cost Analysis of Implementing a Frailty Care Bundle to Reduce Risk of Hospital Associated Decline Among Older Patients.实施衰弱护理包以降低老年患者医院相关性衰退风险的经济成本分析
J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2024 Sep 1;9(3):218-226. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-09-218. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Introducing a pharmacist-led transmural care program to reduce drug-related problems in orthogeriatric patients: a prospective interventional study.引入药剂师主导的跨领域护理方案以减少老年骨科患者的药物相关问题:一项前瞻性干预研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 11;24(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04591-w.
3
Evaluation of Whether Emergency Physicians Should Join the Multidisciplinary Team for Older Hip Fracture Patients.
评估急诊医生是否应加入老年髋部骨折患者的多学科团队。
Front Surg. 2022 May 18;9:842978. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.842978. eCollection 2022.