Orthogeriatric Service, Geriatric Unit, Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Regional Direction for Health and Welfare Umbria Region, Perugia, Italy.
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Apr;30(4):907-916. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04858-2. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
Treatment of older adults with hip fracture is a healthcare challenge. Orthogeriatric comanagement that is an integrated model of care with shared responsibility improves time to surgery and reduces the length of hospital stay and mortality compared with orthopedic care with geriatric consultation service and usual orthopedic care, respectively.
Treatment of fractures in older adults is a clinical challenge due partly to the presence of comorbidity and polypharmacy. The goal of orthogeriatric models of care is to improve clinical outcomes among older people with hip fractures. We compare clinical outcomes of persons with hip fracture cared according to orthogeriatric comanagement (OGC), orthopedic team with the support of a geriatric consultant service (GCS), and usual orthopedic care (UOC).
This is a single-center, pre-post intervention observational study with two parallel arms, OGC and GCS, and a retrospective control arm. Hip fracture patients admitted to the trauma ward were assigned by the orthopedic surgeon to the OGC (n = 112) or GCS (n = 108) group. The intervention groups were compared each with others and both with the retrospective control group (n = 210) of older adults with hip fracture. Several clinical indicators are considered, including time to surgery, length of stay, in-hospital, and 1-year mortality.
Patients in the OGC (OR 2.62; CI 95% 1.40-4.91) but not those in the GCS (OR 0.74; CI 95% 0.38-1.47) showed a higher probability of undergoing surgery within 48 h compared with those in the UOC. Moreover, the OGC (β, - 1.08; SE, 0.54, p = 0.045) but not the GCS (β, - 0.79; SE, 0.53, p = 0.148) was inversely associated with LOS. Ultimately, patients in the OGC (OR 0.31; CI 95 % 0.10-0.96) but not those in the GCS (OR 0.37; CI 95% 0.10-1.38) experienced a significantly lower 1-year mortality rate compared with those in the UOC. All analyses were independent of several confounders.
Older adults with hip fracture taken in care by the OGC showed better clinical indicators, including time to surgery, length of stay and mortality, than those managed by geriatric consultant service or usual orthopedic care.
老年人髋部骨折的治疗是医疗保健面临的挑战。与骨科护理加老年科会诊服务和常规骨科护理相比,骨科-老年科联合管理(OGC)这种整合护理模式共同承担责任,可缩短手术时间,减少住院时间和死亡率。
老年人骨折的治疗是一项临床挑战,部分原因是存在合并症和多药治疗。骨科护理模式的目标是改善髋部骨折老年人的临床结局。我们比较了根据骨科-老年科联合管理(OGC)、骨科团队加老年科会诊服务(GCS)和常规骨科护理(UOC)接受治疗的髋部骨折患者的临床结局。
这是一项单中心、干预前后观察性研究,设 OGC 和 GCS 两个平行组和一个回顾性对照组。骨科医生将创伤病房收治的髋部骨折患者分配至 OGC(n=112)或 GCS(n=108)组。将干预组与对照组进行比较,并将两者与回顾性对照组(n=210)进行比较。考虑了包括手术时间、住院时间、住院和 1 年死亡率在内的几个临床指标。
与 UOC 相比,OGC 组(OR 2.62;95%CI 1.40-4.91)而不是 GCS 组(OR 0.74;95%CI 0.38-1.47)患者更有可能在 48 小时内接受手术。此外,OGC(β,-1.08;SE,0.54,p=0.045)而不是 GCS(β,-0.79;SE,0.53,p=0.148)与 LOS 呈负相关。最终,与 UOC 相比,OGC 组(OR 0.31;95%CI 0.10-0.96)而非 GCS 组(OR 0.37;95%CI 0.10-1.38)患者的 1 年死亡率显著降低。所有分析均独立于多个混杂因素。
与接受老年科会诊服务或常规骨科护理的患者相比,接受 OGC 治疗的髋部骨折老年患者的手术时间、住院时间和死亡率等临床指标均有改善。