Kanjlia Shipra, Loiotile Rita E, Harhen Nora, Bedny Marina
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 346 Baker Hall, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Facebook, United States.
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 1;236:118023. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118023. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
Studies of occipital cortex plasticity in blindness provide insight into how intrinsic constraints interact with experience to determine cortical specialization. We tested the cognitive nature and anatomical origins of occipital responses during non-verbal, non-spatial auditory tasks. In a go/no-go task, congenitally blind (N=23) and sighted (N=24) individuals heard rapidly occurring (<1/s) non-verbal sounds and made one of two button presses (frequent-go 50%, infrequent-go 25%) or withheld a response (no-go, 25%). Rapid and frequent button presses heighten response selection/inhibition demands on the no-go trials: In sighted and blind adults a right-lateralized prefrontal (PFC) network responded most to no-go trials, followed by infrequent-go and finally frequent-go trials. In the blind group only, a right-lateralized occipital network showed the same response profile and the laterality of occipital and PFC responses was correlated across blind individuals. A second experiment with spoken sentences and equations (N=16) found that no-go responses in occipital cortex are distinct from previously identified occipital responses to spoken language. Finally, in resting-state data (N=30 blind, N=31 blindfolded sighted), no-go responsive 'visual' cortex of blind relative to sighted participants was more synchronized with PFC and less synchronized with primary auditory and sensory-motor cortices. No-go responsive occipital cortex showed higher resting-state correlations with no-go responsive PFC than language responsive inferior frontal cortex. We conclude that in blindness, a right-lateralized occipital network responds to non-verbal executive processes, including response selection. These results suggest that connectivity with fronto-parietal executive networks is a key mechanism for plasticity in blindness.
对盲人枕叶皮质可塑性的研究有助于深入了解内在限制因素如何与经验相互作用以决定皮质特化。我们测试了非语言、非空间听觉任务中枕叶反应的认知性质和解剖学起源。在一个“是/否”任务中,先天性盲人(N = 23)和有视力的人(N = 24)听到快速出现的(<1次/秒)非语言声音,并做出两种按键反应之一(频繁“是”50%,不频繁“是”25%)或不做反应(“否”,25%)。快速且频繁的按键增加了“否”试验中反应选择/抑制的需求:在有视力的成年人和盲人中,右侧前额叶(PFC)网络对“否”试验反应最为强烈,其次是不频繁“是”试验,最后是频繁“是”试验。仅在盲人组中,右侧枕叶网络表现出相同的反应模式,并且盲人个体中枕叶和PFC反应的偏侧性具有相关性。第二个使用口语句子和等式的实验(N = 16)发现,枕叶皮质中的“否”反应与先前确定的对口语的枕叶反应不同。最后,在静息状态数据中(N = 30名盲人,N = 31名蒙眼有视力者),与有视力的参与者相比,盲人的“否”反应性“视觉”皮质与PFC的同步性更高,与初级听觉和感觉运动皮质的同步性更低。“否”反应性枕叶皮质与“否”反应性PFC的静息状态相关性高于语言反应性额下回皮质。我们得出结论,在失明状态下,右侧枕叶网络对包括反应选择在内的非语言执行过程做出反应。这些结果表明,与额顶叶执行网络的连接是失明状态下可塑性的关键机制。