• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trends in Receipt of American Diabetes Association Guideline-Recommended Care Among U.S. Adults With Diabetes: NHANES 2005-2018.美国成年人糖尿病患者接受美国糖尿病协会指南推荐治疗的趋势:NHANES 2005-2018 年。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jun;44(6):1300-1308. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2541. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
National patterns in diabetes screening: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2012.糖尿病筛查的全国模式:来自2005 - 2012年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 May;30(5):612-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3147-8. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
3
Trends in Preventive Care Services Among U.S. Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes, 2008-2020.美国成年糖尿病患者预防保健服务趋势,2008-2020 年。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Dec 1;46(12):2285-2291. doi: 10.2337/dc23-1119.
4
Use of Antihyperglycemic Medications in U.S. Adults: An Analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.美国成年人使用抗高血糖药物情况分析:基于全国健康和营养调查的研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jun;43(6):1227-1233. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2424. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
5
Impact of changes in diabetes screening guidelines on testing eligibility and potential yield among adults without diagnosed diabetes in the United States.美国未被诊断为糖尿病的成年人中,糖尿病筛查指南的改变对检测资格和潜在收益的影响。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Mar;197:110572. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110572. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
6
Association between processes of diabetes care and health care utilization in patients with diabetes: Evidence from a nationally representative US sample.糖尿病患者的糖尿病护理流程与医疗保健利用之间的关联:来自全美代表性样本的证据。
J Diabetes. 2021 Jan;13(1):78-88. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13109. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
7
Trends in Self-reported Prediabetes and Metformin Use in the USA: NHANES 2005-2014.美国自我报告的糖尿病前期及二甲双胍使用趋势:2005 - 2014年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):95-101. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05398-5. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
8
Achievement of American Diabetes Association clinical practice recommendations among U.S. adults with diabetes, 1999-2002: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.1999 - 2002年美国糖尿病协会临床实践建议在美国成年糖尿病患者中的实施情况:国家健康与营养检查调查
Diabetes Care. 2006 Mar;29(3):531-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.03.06.dc05-1254.
9
Trends in Diabetes Management Among US Adults: 1999-2016.美国成年人糖尿病管理趋势:1999 - 2016年
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1427-1434. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05587-2. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
10
Adherence to guidelines for youths with diabetes mellitus.青少年糖尿病患者指南的依从性。
Pediatrics. 2011 Sep;128(3):531-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3641. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Dietary Patterns, Sodium Reduction, and Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes: The DASH4D Randomized Clinical Trial.2型糖尿病患者的饮食模式、钠摄入减少与血压:DASH4D随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Jun 9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.1580.
2
Differential cardiovascular risk profiles by sex among adults with CKD: a NHANES-based analysis.慢性肾脏病成年患者中按性别划分的心血管疾病风险差异:基于美国国家健康与营养检查调查的分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 2;12:1544590. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1544590. eCollection 2025.
3
Association between dietary inflammatory index and all-cause mortality in US adults with dermatitis: a population-based cohort study.美国成年皮炎患者饮食炎症指数与全因死亡率之间的关联:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Front Nutr. 2024 Oct 11;11:1469630. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1469630. eCollection 2024.
4
The Michigan Collaborative for Type 2 Diabetes (MCT2D): Development and implementation of a statewide collaborative quality initiative.密歇根州 2 型糖尿病合作研究(MCT2D):全州合作质量倡议的制定和实施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 17;24(1):1254. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11520-z.
5
Relationship between oxidative balance score and prostate cancer: a cross-sectional study of NHANES, 1999-2010.氧化平衡评分与前列腺癌的关系:1999 - 2010年美国国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)的横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 16;14(9):e084700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084700.
6
Healthcare Utilization and Discrepancies by Income Level Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in Korea: An Analysis of National Health Insurance Sample Cohort Data.韩国新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者按收入水平的医疗利用情况和差异:国家健康保险抽样队列数据分析。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2024 Sep;57(5):471-479. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.24.165. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
7
Association between lipid accumulation product and psoriasis among adults: a nationally representative cross-sectional study.脂联素与成年人银屑病的相关性:一项全国代表性横断面研究。
Lipids Health Dis. 2024 May 17;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12944-024-02123-y.
8
Trends in Preventive Care Services Among U.S. Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes, 2008-2020.美国成年糖尿病患者预防保健服务趋势,2008-2020 年。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Dec 1;46(12):2285-2291. doi: 10.2337/dc23-1119.
9
Trends in glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid control in adults with diabetes in Switzerland: the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus Study.瑞士糖尿病患者血糖、血压和血脂控制的变化趋势:CoLaus|PsyCoLaus 研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 May;11(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003377.
10
Perspective of People With Type 2 Diabetes Toward Self-management: Qualitative Study Based on Web Crawler Data.2 型糖尿病患者自我管理态度的观点:基于网络爬虫数据的定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 2;25:e39325. doi: 10.2196/39325.

美国成年人糖尿病患者接受美国糖尿病协会指南推荐治疗的趋势:NHANES 2005-2018 年。

Trends in Receipt of American Diabetes Association Guideline-Recommended Care Among U.S. Adults With Diabetes: NHANES 2005-2018.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2021 Jun;44(6):1300-1308. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2541. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

DOI:10.2337/dc20-2541
PMID:33863753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8247496/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize national trends and characteristics of adults with diabetes receiving American Diabetes Association (ADA) guideline-recommended care.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed serial cross-sectional analyses of 4,069 adults aged ≥20 years with diabetes who participated in the 2005-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

RESULTS

Overall, the proportion of U.S. adults with diabetes receiving ADA guideline-recommended care meeting all five criteria by self-report in the past year (having a primary doctor for diabetes and one or more visits for this doctor, HbA testing, an eye examination, a foot examination, and cholesterol testing) increased from 25.0% in 2005-2006 to 34.1% in 2017-2018 (-trend 0.004). For participants with age ≥65 years, it increased from 29.3% in 2005-2006 to 44.2% in 2017-2018 (-trend 0.001), whereas for participants with age 40-64 and 20-39 years, it did not change significantly during the same time period: 25.2% to 25.8% (-trend 0.457) and 9.9% to 26.0% (-trend 0.401), respectively. Those who were not receiving ADA guideline-recommended care were more likely to be younger, of lower socioeconomic status, uninsured, newly diagnosed with diabetes, not on diabetes medication, and free of hypercholesterolemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Receipt of ADA guideline-recommended care increased only among adults with diabetes aged ≥65 years in the past decade. In 2017-2018, only one of three U.S. adults with diabetes reported receiving ADA guideline-recommended care, with even a lower receipt of care among those <65 years of age. Efforts are needed to improve health care delivery and equity in diabetes care. Insurance status is an important modifiable determinant of receiving ADA guideline-recommended care.

摘要

目的

描述接受美国糖尿病协会(ADA)指南推荐的护理的成年糖尿病患者的国家趋势和特征。

研究设计和方法

我们对参加 2005-2018 年全国健康和营养调查(NHANES)的≥20 岁患有糖尿病的 4069 名成年人进行了连续横断面分析。

结果

总体而言,自我报告过去一年接受 ADA 指南推荐的护理并符合所有五项标准的美国成年人的比例(有糖尿病主治医生且有一次或多次就诊、HbA 检测、眼部检查、足部检查和胆固醇检测)从 2005-2006 年的 25.0%增加到 2017-2018 年的 34.1%(趋势 0.004)。对于≥65 岁的参与者,从 2005-2006 年的 29.3%增加到 2017-2018 年的 44.2%(趋势 0.001),而对于 40-64 岁和 20-39 岁的参与者,在同一时期内没有明显变化:25.2%至 25.8%(趋势 0.457)和 9.9%至 26.0%(趋势 0.401)。未接受 ADA 指南推荐护理的人更年轻、社会经济地位较低、没有保险、新诊断为糖尿病、未服用糖尿病药物且无高胆固醇血症。

结论

在过去十年中,仅≥65 岁的成年糖尿病患者接受 ADA 指南推荐的护理的比例有所增加。2017-2018 年,三分之一的美国成年糖尿病患者报告接受 ADA 指南推荐的护理,而年龄<65 岁的患者接受护理的比例更低。需要努力改善糖尿病护理的医疗服务提供和公平性。保险状况是接受 ADA 指南推荐护理的重要可改变决定因素。