• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者的糖尿病护理流程与医疗保健利用之间的关联:来自全美代表性样本的证据。

Association between processes of diabetes care and health care utilization in patients with diabetes: Evidence from a nationally representative US sample.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice & Administration, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California.

出版信息

J Diabetes. 2021 Jan;13(1):78-88. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13109. Epub 2020 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1111/1753-0407.13109
PMID:32851797
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study examined the association between quality of processes of diabetes care in terms of adherence to American Diabetes Association (ADA)-recommended guidelines and health care utilization in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

Adults with diabetes were identified from the pool of five panels of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a nationally representative US sample, between 2012 and 2017. The Diabetes Care Survey was used to determine adherence to the ADA-recommended guidelines for processes of diabetes care if all of the following were performed annually: glycosylated hemoglobin check, foot examination, dilated eye examination, lipid panel, influenza immunization, blood pressure check, and dental examination. Health care utilization in terms of inpatient hospitalization, and emergency department (ED) and outpatient visits were estimated using two-part hurdle models.

RESULTS

An estimated 26.3 million adults with diabetes were derived from the pooled 5-panel data, of which 7.8% met the ADA-recommended guidelines for processes of diabetes care, and adherence rates of individual recommendations were generally below 50%. Overall, adults who adhered to the ADA-recommendations were older, non-Hispanic white, and married nonsmokers with private insurance and higher income. Mean inpatient hospital stays, ED, and outpatient visits between ADA-adherent vs nonadherent patients were 0.98 vs 1.62 (P < .001), 0.36 vs 0.39 (P = .074), and 17.9 vs 12.8 (P < .001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic disadvantage and minority status were linked with nonadherence to the ADA-recommended processes of diabetes care. Adherence to the ADA recommendation was associated with significant reduction in inpatient hospitalization and a trend toward less ED visits. Our findings may apply to the United States and are likely to be different in other parts of the world.

摘要

背景

本研究考察了糖尿病治疗过程中的质量与糖尿病患者医疗保健利用之间的关系,该质量是根据对美国糖尿病协会(ADA)推荐指南的遵循程度来评估的。

方法

本研究从 2012 年至 2017 年期间,从五项美国医疗支出调查小组中抽取了成年糖尿病患者作为样本。如果每年都完成以下所有检查,则使用糖尿病护理调查来确定对 ADA 推荐的糖尿病治疗过程指南的遵循情况:糖化血红蛋白检查、足部检查、散瞳检查、血脂检查、流感疫苗接种、血压检查和牙科检查。使用两部分门限模型估计住院、急诊(ED)和门诊就诊的医疗保健利用情况。

结果

从汇总的五组数据中估计有 2630 万成年糖尿病患者,其中 7.8%符合 ADA 推荐的糖尿病治疗过程指南,而个别建议的遵循率通常低于 50%。总体而言,符合 ADA 建议的成年人年龄较大、为非西班牙裔白人、已婚不吸烟者、拥有私人保险和较高收入。与不符合 ADA 建议的患者相比,符合 ADA 建议的患者的平均住院天数、ED 和门诊就诊次数分别为 0.98 天 vs 1.62 天(P < 0.001)、0.36 次 vs 0.39 次(P = 0.074)和 17.9 次 vs 12.8 次(P < 0.001)。

结论

社会经济劣势和少数民族身份与不符合 ADA 推荐的糖尿病治疗过程有关。符合 ADA 建议与住院治疗显著减少和 ED 就诊次数减少趋势相关。我们的研究结果可能适用于美国,而在世界其他地区可能有所不同。

相似文献

1
Association between processes of diabetes care and health care utilization in patients with diabetes: Evidence from a nationally representative US sample.糖尿病患者的糖尿病护理流程与医疗保健利用之间的关联:来自全美代表性样本的证据。
J Diabetes. 2021 Jan;13(1):78-88. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13109. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
2
Adherence to guidelines for youths with diabetes mellitus.青少年糖尿病患者指南的依从性。
Pediatrics. 2011 Sep;128(3):531-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3641. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
3
Effects of Practice Ownership and Integration of Health Services on Adherence to Diabetes Guidelines.实践所有权和医疗服务整合对遵守糖尿病指南的影响。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241259685. doi: 10.1177/21501319241259685.
4
Characteristics Associated with Adherence to Annual Dilated Eye Examinations among US Patients with Diagnosed Diabetes.美国确诊糖尿病患者坚持年度散瞳检查的相关特征。
Ophthalmology. 2019 Nov;126(11):1492-1499. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.05.033. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
5
Association of select preventative services and hospitalization in people with diabetes.糖尿病患者中特定预防服务与住院治疗的关联
J Diabetes Complications. 2021 May;35(5):107903. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2021.107903. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
6
Adherence to Guidelines for Inpatient Pharmacologic Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Adults and Glycemic Outcomes.成人 2 型糖尿病住院患者药物治疗管理指南的依从性与血糖结局。
Can J Diabetes. 2018 Apr;42(2):158-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
7
Trends in Emergency Department Use by Rural and Urban Populations in the United States.美国农村和城市人口急诊就诊趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191919. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1919.
8
Evaluation of an inpatient psychiatric hospital physician education program and adherence to American Diabetes Association practice recommendations.评估一项住院精神科医院医生教育项目及对美国糖尿病协会实践建议的遵循情况。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Mar 1;73(5 Suppl 1):S57-62. doi: 10.2146/sp150037.
9
Changes in Utilization and Health Among Low-Income Adults After Medicaid Expansion or Expanded Private Insurance.医疗补助扩大或扩大私人保险后,低收入成年人的利用和健康状况的变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Oct 1;176(10):1501-1509. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4419.
10
Unstable Housing and Diabetes-Related Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization: A Nationally Representative Study of Safety-Net Clinic Patients.不稳定住房与糖尿病相关急诊就诊和住院:基于全美代表性的医疗保障诊所患者研究
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):933-939. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1812. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Type 2 Diabetes and Financial Outcomes.2型糖尿病与财务状况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2523453. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.23453.
2
Nonadherence to Diabetes Complications Screening in a Multiethnic Asian Population: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Prospective Study.多民族亚洲人群中糖尿病并发症筛查的不依从性:一项混合方法前瞻性研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 8;14:e63253. doi: 10.2196/63253.
3
Evaluation of diabetes care parameters in patients with diabetes: A population-based cross-sectional study in Khuzestan province (southwest of Iran).
糖尿病患者糖尿病护理参数评估:伊朗西南部胡齐斯坦省一项基于人群的横断面研究。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2024 Aug 13;23(2):2151-2163. doi: 10.1007/s40200-024-01483-7. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Enhancing pharmacist intervention targeting based on patient clustering with unsupervised machine learning.基于无监督机器学习的患者聚类增强药剂师干预靶向性。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Feb;25(2):187-195. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2406810. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
5
Trends and Inequalities in Diabetes-Related Complications Among U.S. Adults, 2000-2020.2000 - 2020年美国成年人糖尿病相关并发症的趋势与不平等现象
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(1):18-28. doi: 10.2337/dci24-0022.
6
Factors associated with nonattendance at annual diabetes check-up in Ningbo, China: a case-control study.中国宁波与糖尿病年度检查失约相关的因素:一项病例对照研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 14;11:1247406. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1247406. eCollection 2023.
7
Impact of diabetes diagnosis on dental care utilization: evidence from Finland.糖尿病诊断对牙科护理利用的影响:来自芬兰的证据。
Health Econ Rev. 2023 May 2;13(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13561-023-00440-z.
8
Perspective of People With Type 2 Diabetes Toward Self-management: Qualitative Study Based on Web Crawler Data.2 型糖尿病患者自我管理态度的观点:基于网络爬虫数据的定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 2;25:e39325. doi: 10.2196/39325.
9
ANDA-Evaluating Facilitated Feedback Enhancement - a Cluster randomised Trial (ANDA-EFFECT): protocol for a cluster randomised trial of audit feedback augmented with education and support, compared to feedback alone, on acceptability, utility and health outcomes in diabetes centres in Australia.ANDA-EFFECT 评估促进反馈增强 - 一项群组随机对照试验方案:该试验比较了在澳大利亚糖尿病中心中,在接受性、实用性和健康结果方面,经教育和支持增强的审计反馈与单独反馈相比的情况。试验采用群组随机对照设计,对增强反馈进行评估。
Trials. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):976. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06910-9.
10
Recent Trends in Diabetes-Associated Hospitalizations in the United States.美国糖尿病相关住院治疗的近期趋势。
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 9;11(22):6636. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226636.