Department of Emergency Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
Department of Emergency Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Emerg Med J. 2021 Aug;38(8):607-612. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210675. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
Early differentiation of febrile young infants with from those without serious infections (SIs) remains a diagnostic challenge. We sought to (1) compare vital signs and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters between febrile infants with versus without SIs, (2) assess the performance of HRV and vital signs with reference to current triage tools and (3) compare HRV and vital signs to HRV, vital signs and blood biomarkers, when predicting for the presence of SIs.
Using a prospective observational design, we recruited patients <3 months old presenting to a tertiary paediatric ED in Singapore from December 2018 through November 2019. We obtained patient demographic characteristics, triage assessment (including the Severity Index Score (SIS)), HRV parameters (time, frequency and non-linear domains) and laboratory results. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses to predict the presence of an SI, using area under the curve (AUC) with the corresponding 95% CI to assess predictive capability.
Among 203 infants with a mean age of 38.4 days (SD 27.6), 67 infants (33.0%) had an SI. There were significant differences in the time, frequency and non-linear domains of HRV parameters between infants with versus without SIs. In predicting SIs, gender, temperature and the HRV non-linear parameter Poincaré plot SD2 (AUC 0.78, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.84) performed better than SIS alone (AUC 0.61, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.68). Model performance improved with the addition of absolute neutrophil count and C reactive protein (AUC 0.82, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.89).
An exploratory prediction model incorporating HRV and biomarkers improved prediction of SIs. Further research is needed to assess if HRV can identify which young febrile infants have an SI at ED triage.
NCT04103151.
早期区分有严重感染(SI)与无严重感染的发热婴儿仍然是一个诊断挑战。我们试图:(1)比较有与无 SI 的发热婴儿之间的生命体征和心率变异性(HRV)参数;(2)评估 HRV 和生命体征与当前分诊工具的相关性;(3)比较 HRV 和生命体征与 HRV、生命体征和血液生物标志物在预测 SI 存在时的表现。
使用前瞻性观察设计,我们于 2018 年 12 月至 2019 年 11 月在新加坡的一家三级儿科急诊室招募了<3 个月大的患者。我们获得了患者的人口统计学特征、分诊评估(包括严重指数评分(SIS))、HRV 参数(时间、频率和非线性域)和实验室结果。我们使用曲线下面积(AUC)和相应的 95%置信区间(CI)进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以预测 SI 的存在,评估预测能力。
在 203 名平均年龄为 38.4 天(SD 27.6)的婴儿中,有 67 名(33.0%)患有 SI。有 SI 的婴儿与无 SI 的婴儿的 HRV 参数的时间、频率和非线性域存在显著差异。在预测 SI 时,性别、体温和 HRV 非线性参数 Poincaré 图 SD2(AUC 0.78,95%CI 0.71 至 0.84)的表现优于单独的 SIS(AUC 0.61,95%CI 0.53 至 0.68)。随着绝对中性粒细胞计数和 C 反应蛋白的加入,模型性能得到了提高(AUC 0.82,95%CI 0.76 至 0.89)。
一个包含 HRV 和生物标志物的探索性预测模型提高了对 SI 的预测。需要进一步研究以评估 HRV 是否可以在 ED 分诊时识别哪些发热的年轻婴儿有 SI。
NCT04103151。