Soc Work. 2021 May 13;66(2):157-166. doi: 10.1093/sw/swab002.
The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program is a federal block grant to the states, with a required state contribution. Although often viewed as a cash assistance program with work requirements and services targeted at extremely low-income families with children, only about one-quarter of all state and federal TANF funds are now used for traditional cash aid. Uses of funds vary widely by state, and alternatives range from refundable tax credits to support of state child welfare systems. In this article, the author examines the relationship between state categorical TANF spending and key social, political, and economic characteristics using data from 2015 to 2017 and multilevel linear models. Racial and ethnic demographics of the cash assistance caseload are associated with differences in spending, with states with larger proportions of the caseload composed of people of color devoting a lower percentage of effort to traditional benefits and more to alternative cash transfers. Changes in unemployment rate within states are associated with greater spending on basic assistance and reduced spending on alternative transfers. These findings indicate that, although TANF cash benefits spending may be economically responsive within the program's overall flexible structure, spending patterns raise issues of equity for disadvantaged families.
《贫困家庭临时援助(TANF)计划》是一项向各州提供的联邦拨款计划,要求各州提供一定的配套资金。尽管该计划通常被视为一项带有工作要求的现金援助计划,服务对象是收入极低且有子女的家庭,但现在只有大约四分之一的州和联邦 TANF 资金用于传统的现金援助。各州对资金的使用方式差异很大,从可退还的税收抵免到支持州儿童福利系统的方式都有。在本文中,作者使用 2015 年至 2017 年的数据和多层次线性模型,考察了州 TANF 专项支出与关键社会、政治和经济特征之间的关系。现金援助对象群体的种族和民族人口统计数据与支出差异相关,在现金援助对象群体中,有色人种比例较大的州在传统福利方面投入的比例较低,而在替代现金转移方面的投入比例较高。州内失业率的变化与基本援助支出的增加和替代转移支出的减少有关。这些发现表明,尽管 TANF 现金福利支出在该计划的整体灵活结构内可能具有经济响应性,但支出模式对弱势家庭的公平性提出了质疑。