Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, 3426-3 Anesaki, Ichihara, Chiba, 299-0111, Japan.
Division of Sleep Medicine, Kaname Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Nov;278(11):4545-4550. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06817-2. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
The purpose of this study was to elucidate the effect of a neck-worn position therapy device (PTD) and oral appliance (OA) on sleep parameters in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Patients with an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) of 5/h or more at baseline polysomnography were divided into a PTD group and an OA group randomly. All participants underwent a type 1 polysomnography for diagnosis and device-set outcome measurements.
The PTD decreased the AHI from a mean of 24.2/h to 16.7/h, and the OA decreased the AHI from 20.8/h to 10.3/h. Snoring duration decreased from 31.1% to 16.9% in the PTD group, and from 41.2% to 30.7% in the OA group. There were no significant differences in these decreases between the two groups. The PTD decreased sleep-time percentage in the supine position from a mean of 67.4% to 4.5%, despite five patients who were unable to avoid the supine position. There were no significant differences in improvement in sleep efficiency, percentage of stage wake, stage N1, stage N2, and stage REM, and overall arousal and respiratory arousal indices between the two groups. However, the spontaneous arousal index worsened in the OA responders but remained unchanged in the PTD responders. Percentage of stage N3 sleep (%N3) was improved in the PTD responders but not in the OA responders. There were significant differences in spontaneous arousal index and %N3 between the two groups.
PTDs are a potential treatment modality that does not disturb sleep in patients with OSA.
本研究旨在阐明颈戴式体位治疗装置(PTD)和口腔矫正器(OA)对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者睡眠参数的影响。
根据基线多导睡眠图上呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)为 5/h 或更高,将患者随机分为 PTD 组和 OA 组。所有参与者均进行了 1 型多导睡眠图检查以进行诊断和设备设置效果评估。
PTD 将 AHI 从平均 24.2/h 降低至 16.7/h,OA 将 AHI 从 20.8/h 降低至 10.3/h。PTD 组的打鼾时间从 31.1%减少至 16.9%,OA 组从 41.2%减少至 30.7%。两组之间的这些减少没有显著差异。尽管有 5 名患者无法避免仰卧位,但 PTD 将仰卧位睡眠时间百分比从平均 67.4%降低至 4.5%。两组之间在睡眠效率、清醒期百分比、N1 期、N2 期和 REM 期、总觉醒和呼吸觉醒指数方面的改善没有显著差异。然而,OA 应答者的自发觉醒指数恶化,而 PTD 应答者则保持不变。PTD 应答者的 N3 期睡眠时间百分比(%N3)有所改善,但 OA 应答者则没有。两组之间在自发觉醒指数和%N3 方面存在显著差异。
PTD 是一种潜在的治疗方法,不会干扰 OSA 患者的睡眠。