Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, Adelaide, South Australia.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2011 Aug 15;7(4):376-83. doi: 10.5664/JCSM.1194.
Approximately 30% of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients have supine-predominant OSA, and simply avoiding supine sleep should normalise respiratory disturbance event rates. However, traditional supine-avoidance therapies are inherently uncomfortable, and treatment adherence is poor and difficult to monitor objectively. This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel, potentially more acceptable position monitor and supine-avoidance device for managing supine-predominant OSA and snoring.
In-laboratory evaluation of position recording accuracy versus video recordings (validation study), and randomized controlled crossover trial of active versus inactive supine-avoidance therapy in the home setting (efficacy study).
17 patients undergoing in-laboratory sleep studies (validation) and 15 patients with supine-predominant OSA (efficacy).
EFFICACY STUDY: 1 week of inactive and 1 week of active treatment in randomized order, separated by 1 week.
Agreement between 30-sec epoch-based posture classifications from device versus video records was high (median κ 0.95, interquartile range: 0.88-1.00), and there was good supine time agreement (bias 0.3%, 95%CI: -4.0% to 4.6%). In the efficacy study, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and snoring frequency were measured in-home using a nasal pressure and microphone based system during inactive and active treatment weeks. The position monitoring and supine alarm device markedly inhibited supine time (mean ± SEM 19.3% ± 4.3% to 0.4% ± 0.3%, p < 0.001) and reduced AHI (25.0 ± 1.7 to 13.7 ± 1.1 events/h, p = 0.030) but not snoring frequency.
This new position monitoring and supine alarm device records sleep position accurately and improves OSA but not snoring in patients with supine-predominant OSA.
约 30%的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者存在仰卧位为主的 OSA,单纯避免仰卧位睡眠应该可以使呼吸紊乱事件的发生率正常化。然而,传统的仰卧位回避疗法本质上是不舒服的,治疗依从性差,难以客观监测。本研究评估了一种新型、可能更易接受的体位监测和仰卧位回避装置在管理以仰卧位为主的 OSA 和打鼾中的疗效。
在实验室中评估与视频记录相比的位置记录准确性(验证研究),以及在家中进行主动与被动仰卧位回避治疗的随机对照交叉试验(疗效研究)。
17 名接受实验室睡眠研究的患者(验证)和 15 名以仰卧位为主的 OSA 患者(疗效)。
疗效研究:以随机顺序接受 1 周的非活性治疗和 1 周的活性治疗,两者之间间隔 1 周。
基于设备和视频记录的 30 秒时相分类之间的一致性很高(中位数κ0.95,四分位间距:0.88-1.00),且仰卧时间的一致性也很好(偏差 0.3%,95%CI:-4.0%至 4.6%)。在疗效研究中,使用基于鼻腔压力和麦克风的系统在家中测量非活性和活性治疗周期间的睡眠呼吸暂停-低通气指数(AHI)和打鼾频率。体位监测和仰卧报警装置显著抑制了仰卧时间(平均值±SEM 19.3%±4.3%至 0.4%±0.3%,p<0.001),并降低了 AHI(25.0±1.7 至 13.7±1.1 事件/小时,p=0.030),但对打鼾频率没有影响。
这种新的体位监测和仰卧报警装置准确记录睡眠体位,可改善以仰卧位为主的 OSA 患者的 OSA,但对打鼾无效。