Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Jul;104(7):7522-7533. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-20019. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
Concentration of milk in the dairy industry is typically achieved by thermal evaporation or reverse osmosis (RO). Heat concentration is energy intensive and leads to cooked flavor and color changes in the final product, and RO is affected by fouling, which limits the final achievable concentration of the product. The main objective of this work was to evaluate forward osmosis (FO) as an alternative method for concentrating milk. The effects of fat content and temperature on the process were evaluated, and the physicochemical properties and sensory qualities of the final product were assessed. Commercially pasteurized skim and whole milk samples were concentrated at 4, 15, and 25°C using a benchtop FO unit. The FO process was assessed by monitoring water flux and product concentration. The color of the milk concentrates was also evaluated. A sensory panel compared the FO concentrated and thermally concentrated milks, diluted to single strength, with high temperature, short time pasteurized milk. The FO experimental runs were conducted in triplicate, and data were analyzed by single-factor ANOVA. Water flux during FO decreased with time under all processing conditions. Higher temperatures led to faster concentration and higher concentration factors for both skim and whole milk. After 5.75 h of FO processing, the concentration factors achieved for skim milk were 2.68 ± 0.08 at 25°C, 2.68 ± 0.09 at 15°C, and 2.36 ± 0.08 at 4°C. For whole milk, after 5.75 h of FO processing, concentration factors of 2.32 ± 0.12 at 25°C, 2.12 ± 0.36 at 15°C, and 1.91 ± 0.15 at 4°C were obtained. Overall, maximum concentration levels of 40.15% total solids for skim milk and 40.94% total solids for whole milk were achieved. Additionally, a triangle sensory test showed no significant differences between regular milk and FO concentrated milk diluted to single strength. This work shows that FO is a viable nonthermal processing method for concentrating milk, but some technical challenges need to be overcome to facilitate commercial utilization.
浓缩乳制品行业中的牛奶通常采用热蒸发或反渗透(RO)方法实现。热浓缩需要大量的能量,并且会导致最终产品的风味和颜色发生变化,而 RO 则受到污染的影响,限制了最终可达到的产品浓度。本研究的主要目的是评估正向渗透(FO)作为浓缩牛奶的替代方法。评估了脂肪含量和温度对该过程的影响,并评估了最终产品的物理化学性质和感官质量。使用台式 FO 装置在 4、15 和 25°C 下浓缩商业巴氏杀菌的脱脂和全脂牛奶样品。通过监测水通量和产品浓度评估 FO 过程。还评估了牛奶浓缩物的颜色。感官小组将 FO 浓缩和热浓缩的牛奶与高温短时间巴氏杀菌的牛奶进行比较,稀释至单强度。FO 实验重复进行三次,通过单因素方差分析对数据进行分析。在所有处理条件下,FO 过程中的水通量随时间的推移而降低。较高的温度导致脱脂和全脂牛奶更快的浓缩和更高的浓缩倍数。在 FO 处理 5.75 小时后,在 25°C 下获得的脱脂牛奶浓缩倍数为 2.68 ± 0.08,在 15°C 下为 2.68 ± 0.09,在 4°C 下为 2.36 ± 0.08。对于全脂牛奶,在 FO 处理 5.75 小时后,获得的浓缩倍数为在 25°C 下为 2.32 ± 0.12,在 15°C 下为 2.12 ± 0.36,在 4°C 下为 1.91 ± 0.15。总体而言,获得了脱脂牛奶的最大浓缩水平为 40.15%总固体,全脂牛奶的最大浓缩水平为 40.94%总固体。此外,三角感官测试表明,常规牛奶和稀释至单强度的 FO 浓缩牛奶之间没有显著差异。这项工作表明,FO 是一种可行的非热加工方法,可用于浓缩牛奶,但需要克服一些技术挑战才能促进商业利用。